so far I think the *method*.getDeclaredAnnotations() when I don't have the @CustomInterceptor is the findBy instead of the findLocationById...but I can't understand why :( that's why no annotation it's on the list, but makes no sense. I'm going to try to figure out the behaviour with and without the @CustomInterceptor.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Thomas Andraschko < [email protected]> wrote: > do you mean that method.getDeclaredAnnotations does not return CacheResult? > > 2018-04-23 10:09 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <[email protected]>: > > > Good morning, > > > > there's still something weird. Only works when I got the > @CustomInterceptor > > there. > > > > @CacheResult(cacheName = "loc-cache") > > @CustomInterceptor //only seems to work when I have this annotation > > here > > public Location findLocationById(@CacheKey Integer locId) > > { > > //just a wrapper for caching... > > return findBy(locId); > > } > > > > I'm trying to understand from the trace why the @CacheResult is not > visible > > alone... > > > > addInterceptorBindings(beanManager, bindings, > > method.getDeclaredAnnotations()); <--should see all the annotation... > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:11 PM, Thomas Andraschko < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Would be great if you could create a issue + unittest, so i can fix it > > next > > > week. > > > > > > Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves : > > > > > > > I have to leave :( don't do any change until I can confirm everything > > ;( > > > > > > > > have a nice weekend. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > well....I think we might have an issue with the proceed part: > > > > > > > > > > try { > > > > > //Call the annotated method > > > > > result = this.proceed(invocation); <-- this is not calling my > > > > > method...I think is because the invocation is > > > > org.apache.deltaspike.proxy. > > > > > impl.invocation.ManualInvocationContext@69b38203 instead of my > > method > > > :( > > > > > > > > > > any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> seems to work: org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.im > > > > >> pl.invocation.ManualInvocationContext@59fae308 > > > > >> > > > > >> not sure the cache is actually working but I think it's not > related > > > with > > > > >> DS. If possible release a version with the fix: > > > > >> > > > > >> @ApplicationScoped > > > > >> @Specializes > > > > >> public class CustomDeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup extends > > > > >> InterceptorLookup > > > > >> { > > > > >> > > > > >> @Override > > > > >> protected void addInterceptorBindings(BeanManager > beanManager, > > > > >> ArrayList<Annotation> bindings, > > > > >> Annotation[] declaredAnnotations) > > > > >> { > > > > >> for (Annotation annotation : declaredAnnotations) > > > > >> { > > > > >> if (bindings.contains(annotation)) > > > > >> { > > > > >> continue; > > > > >> } > > > > >> > > > > >> Class<? extends Annotation> annotationType = > > > > >> annotation.annotationType(); > > > > >> > > > > >> * if (**beanManager.isInterceptorBinding( > > annotationType))* > > > > >> { > > > > >> bindings.add(annotation); > > > > >> } > > > > >> > > > > >> if (beanManager.isStereotype(annotationType)) *///fun > > > part > > > > >> is that here is well done ;)* > > > > >> { > > > > >> for (Annotation subAnnotation : > > > > >> annotationType.getDeclaredAnnotations()) > > > > >> { > > > > >> if (bindings.contains(subAnnotation)) > > > > >> { > > > > >> continue; > > > > >> } > > > > >> > > > > >> if (subAnnotation.annotationType( > > > > >> ).isAnnotationPresent(InterceptorBinding.class)) > > > > >> { > > > > >> bindings.add(subAnnotation); > > > > >> } > > > > >> } > > > > >> } > > > > >> } > > > > >> } > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks very much Thomas :) > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Luís Alves < > [email protected]> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> found this one: org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.im > > > > >>> pl.invocation.InterceptorLookup on version 1.8.0 > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Luís Alves < > [email protected] > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> where the hell is DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup? which jar I > > > have > > > > >>>> to import?! > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Luís Alves < > > [email protected]> > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> I'll try....@Specializes on CustomDeltaSpikeProxyIntercept > > orLookup > > > > >>>>> extends DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup should do the trick. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Thomas Andraschko < > > > > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> https://docs.jboss.org/cdi/api/2.0/javax/enterprise/inject/s > > > > >>>>>> pi/BeanManager.html#isInterceptorBinding-java.lang.Class- > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Would be great if you can test it, create a issue and provide > a > > > > patch. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves : > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > I have no idea if it's possible or not. Isn't any CDI expert > > on > > > > the > > > > >>>>>> mailing > > > > >>>>>> > list that want to help? ;) > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/enterprise/ > inject > > > /spi/ > > > > >>>>>> > BeforeBeanDiscovery.html#addInterceptorBinding-javax. > enterpr > > > > >>>>>> ise.inject.spi > > > > >>>>>> > . > > > > >>>>>> > AnnotatedType- doesn't make the annotation visible to > > > > >>>>>> (annotationType. > > > > >>>>>> > isAnnotationPresent(InterceptorBinding.class))...we need > some > > > > >>>>>> runtime way > > > > >>>>>> > to check it... > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > BTW if a solutions is found can you make it available on > > 1.8.2? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Andraschko < > > > > >>>>>> > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > Yep, they add the interceptorBinding dynamically: > > > > >>>>>> > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI/ > blob/master/cache-annotations- > > > > >>>>>> > > ri/cache-annotations-ri-cdi/src/main/java/org/jsr107/ri/ > > anno > > > > >>>>>> tations/cdi/ > > > > >>>>>> > > InterceptorExtension.java > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > Just check our code here: > > > > >>>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/blob/master/ > > > > >>>>>> > > deltaspike/modules/proxy/api/src/main/java/org/apache/ > > > > >>>>>> > > deltaspike/proxy/spi/invocation/ > > DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLo > > > ok > > > > >>>>>> > up.java#L90 > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > This code would need ask CDI if this annotation is a > > > interceptor > > > > >>>>>> binding > > > > >>>>>> > > (if possible, not sure if it's in the CDI API). Then your > > case > > > > >>>>>> should > > > > >>>>>> > work. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > 2018-04-20 16:25 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves < > > [email protected] > > > >: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > This is the reference implementation of the > interceptors: > > > > >>>>>> > > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI > > > > >>>>>> > > > They have: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"; > > > > >>>>>> > > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/ > > 2001/XMLSchema-instance > > > " > > > > >>>>>> > > > xsi:schemaLocation=" > > > > >>>>>> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee > > > > >>>>>> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd";> > > > > >>>>>> > > > <interceptors> > > > > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi. > > > > >>>>>> > > > CacheResultInterceptor</class> > > > > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi. > > > > >>>>>> > CachePutInterceptor</class> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotatio > > > ns.cdi.CacheRemoveEntryInterce > > > > >>>>>> ptor</ > > > > >>>>>> > class> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotatio > > > ns.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercept > > > > >>>>>> or</class> > > > > >>>>>> > > > </interceptors> > > > > >>>>>> > > > </beans> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > and they have 2files with: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.InterceptorExtension > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > and > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CdiAnnotationProviderImpl > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > The interceptors work on a normal cdi bean. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Andraschko < > > > > >>>>>> > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > AFAIK there 2 ways of using interceptors with CDI: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > 1) @InterceptorBinding > > > > >>>>>> > > > > 2) @Interceptors(..) > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > We only support 1) currently. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > So i have currently no idea how @CacheResult will work > > > even > > > > a > > > > >>>>>> normal > > > > >>>>>> > > CDI > > > > >>>>>> > > > > bean. Maybe it's done in Wildfly but not via the > > "normal" > > > > CDI > > > > >>>>>> way. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > 2018-04-20 15:48 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves < > > > > [email protected] > > > > >>>>>> >: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > Submitted: https://github.com/jsr107/ > > > > jsr107spec/issues/401 > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > I suppose they will tell the issue is from DS...:( > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Luís Alves < > > > > >>>>>> [email protected] > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > I suppose it's CDI capable. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107 > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > Red Hat > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > : Pete Muir <--- is on the expert group > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > * @author Gavin King > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > * @author Pete Muir > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > * @author Antoine Sabot-Durand > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > */ > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD, FIELD }) > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Retention(RUNTIME) > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Documented > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > @NormalScope > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Inherited > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > public @interface ApplicationScoped { > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > } > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > what I don't understand is how DS look for the > > > > >>>>>> interceptors? Can > > > > >>>>>> > > you > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > point > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > me out the code? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > Isn't possible to look for all annotations even if > > > they > > > > >>>>>> don't > > > > >>>>>> > have > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > @InterceptorBinding and then look for the > registered > > > > >>>>>> > interceptors? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Luís Alves < > > > > >>>>>> > [email protected] > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> I suppose it's CDI capable. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107 > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Thomas > Andraschko > > < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> Puh, i wonder why they did it without binding. > > > > >>>>>> CacheResult is > > > > >>>>>> > > > > actually > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> exactly a binding for the interceptor. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> Is it CDI compatible? Never had a look at the > > cache > > > > API > > > > >>>>>> ;) > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> Even there is a bridge or something available ( > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> https://github.com/tomitribe/jcache-cdi), i'm > not > > > > sure > > > > >>>>>> if this > > > > >>>>>> > > > would > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> work > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> with the limited ability to add interceptors to > > > > partial > > > > >>>>>> beans. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> I think the best solution for now is to create a > > own > > > > >>>>>> binding. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> 2018-04-20 14:55 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves < > > > > >>>>>> [email protected]>: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > uhm...that's not good :S > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > the annotation is this one: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > https://static.javadoc.io/java > > > > >>>>>> x.cache/cache-api/1.0.0/ > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > javax/cache/annotation/CacheResult.html > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > is there a way that using that annotation we > get > > > the > > > > >>>>>> > > interceptor > > > > >>>>>> > > > to > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> work? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > (I can implement the interceptor myself....as > I > > > said > > > > >>>>>> I cannot > > > > >>>>>> > > > > modify > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> the > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > annotation as it is javax packge) > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Thomas > > > Andraschko < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > Just to be clear: I have no idea how > > internally > > > > >>>>>> CacheResult > > > > >>>>>> > > > works > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> but our > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > partial beans only supports CDI interceptors > > by > > > a > > > > >>>>>> binding > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > (InterceptorBinding). > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > Everything else, like stated in the doc > > > > >>>>>> (@Interceptors, > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > @Intercepted, > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > @Decorator), is not supported. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > 2018-04-20 14:31 GMT+02:00 Thomas > Andraschko < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > [email protected] > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > In must not work without the > > > interceptorbinding. > > > > >>>>>> Do you > > > > >>>>>> > > mean > > > > >>>>>> > > > > that > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> it > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > does > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > work without? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís > > Alves > > > : > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> can you update your test to remove > > > > >>>>>> @InterceptorBinding? > > > > >>>>>> > > and > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > check > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> if > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > it > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> works? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> javax.cache.annotation.CacheResult is > > > > standard > > > > >>>>>> so I > > > > >>>>>> > > don't > > > > >>>>>> > > > > want > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> to > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > extend > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> it to have the @InterceptorBinding.....if > > > this > > > > >>>>>> is really > > > > >>>>>> > > the > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> problem. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Luís > > Alves < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Retention(RUNTIME) > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD }) > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > // @InterceptorBinding > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > public @interface CustomInterceptor > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > { > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > } > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > I suspect is this > > > @InterceptorBinding....but > > > > >>>>>> not 100% > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> sure....what > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > is > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> the > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > purpose of that? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Luís > > > Alves < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> don't you want to rewrite your tests > > with > > > > the > > > > >>>>>> > > > @CacheResult > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > interceptor > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> ;) > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> ? to see if it works? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM, > Thomas > > > > >>>>>> Andraschko < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> No idea, debug if the interceptor is > > > really > > > > >>>>>> called > > > > >>>>>> > ;) > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 2018-04-20 13:56 GMT+02:00 Luís > Alves < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > [email protected] > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > moved the @CustomInterceptor > > > declaration > > > > >>>>>> of the > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > interceptor > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> for > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > the > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> web app > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > beans.xml and now it gets > > called....SO > > > it > > > > >>>>>> should > > > > >>>>>> > > work > > > > >>>>>> > > > > for > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> the > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > cache > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> as > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > well. Any hint? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM, > > Luís > > > > >>>>>> Alves < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > [email protected] > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > So I've created a custom one (in > > fact > > > > is > > > > >>>>>> a > > > > >>>>>> > "copy" > > > > >>>>>> > > of > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > yours > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > that > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> logs > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> a > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > line): > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Interceptor > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @CustomInterceptor > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public class > CustomInterceptorImpl > > > > >>>>>> implements > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > Serializable > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > { > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private static final long > > > > >>>>>> serialVersionUID = > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 7327752605570037403L; > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Inject > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private Logger logger; > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @AroundInvoke > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public Object > > > > >>>>>> interceptIt(InvocationContext > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > invocationContext) > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> throws > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > Exception > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > { > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > logger.info("yay :) > > > > >>>>>> > CustomInterceptorImpl > > > > >>>>>> > > > was > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > called"); > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > return > > > > >>>>>> invocationContext.proceed(); > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > } > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > } > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > registered on the beans.xml (for > > > > service > > > > >>>>>> and > > > > >>>>>> > repo > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > layers): > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <?xml version="1.0" > > > encoding="UTF-8"?> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <beans xmlns=" > > > http://java.sun.com/xml > > > > >>>>>> /ns/javaee > > > > >>>>>> > " > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> xmlns:xsi=" > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSche > > > > >>>>>> ma-instance" > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > xsi:schemaLocation="http:// > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jav > > > > >>>>>> aee/beans_1_0.xsd > > > > >>>>>> > "> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <interceptors> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati > > > > >>>>>> ons.cdi. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > CacheResultInterceptor</class> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ... > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > <class>eu.gls.ddtm.config. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > CustomInterceptorImpl</class> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </interceptors> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </beans> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > It's called on the service layer > > but > > > > not > > > > >>>>>> on the > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> @Repository :( > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ...I'm using Wildfly 10 (CDI > > 1.x)... > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:50 AM, > > > > Thomas > > > > >>>>>> > > Andraschko > > > > >>>>>> > > > < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> You can try with a custom > > > interceptor > > > > >>>>>> and check > > > > >>>>>> > > if > > > > >>>>>> > > > > it's > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > invoked? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I assume you don't use > > > > weld-2.0.0.Final > > > > >>>>>> or > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> weld-2.0.0.SP1? We > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> have a > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> exclusion for this in the unit > > test > > > as > > > > >>>>>> there is > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > something > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > broken, > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> as you > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> can check in the link i posted > > > before. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> Otherwise, it would be great if > > you > > > > >>>>>> could > > > > >>>>>> > > provide a > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> unittest > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > for > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> the > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > data > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> module. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I don't have time to prepare it > by > > > > >>>>>> myself. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> 2018-04-20 12:40 GMT+02:00 Luís > > > Alves > > > > < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected] > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > So far no > success...@CacheResult > > > on > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @ApplicationScoped > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @Repository > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > public abstract class > > > SomeRepository > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > doesn't seem to work :S not > sure > > > > what > > > > >>>>>> I'm > > > > >>>>>> > doing > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > wrong. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:03 > > AM, > > > > >>>>>> Luís Alves > > > > >>>>>> > < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > I ditched the > > > CustomBaseRepository > > > > >>>>>> for > > > > >>>>>> > > > now...but > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> still > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > can't > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> get the > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > cache > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > interceptor to work...here > is > > my > > > > >>>>>> beans.xml: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <?xml version="1.0" > > > > >>>>>> encoding="UTF-8"?> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <beans xmlns=" > > > > http://java.sun.com/ > > > > >>>>>> > > > xml/ns/javaee" > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > xmlns:xsi=" > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSche > > > > >>>>>> ma-instance" > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > xsi:schemaLocation="http:// > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/ > > > > >>>>>> > > > javaee/beans_1_0.xsd > > > > >>>>>> > > > > "> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <interceptors> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri. > > > > >>>>>> > > annotations.cdi. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > CacheResultInterceptor</class> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri. > > > > >>>>>> > > annotations.cdi. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > CacheRemoveEntryInterceptor</ > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercep > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> tor</ > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CachePutInterceptor</ > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> class> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </interceptors> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </beans> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > LA > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at > 10:45 > > > AM, > > > > >>>>>> Luís > > > > >>>>>> > Alves > > > > >>>>>> > > < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected] > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Thanks Thomas, > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> if I understood correctly > if > > > they > > > > >>>>>> are on > > > > >>>>>> > the > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> bean.xml > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > they > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> should > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> works > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> :)...only annotated one > don't > > > > work. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> I'm now (not sure why I > > didn't > > > > had > > > > >>>>>> it > > > > >>>>>> > > before) > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> getting: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > org.apache.deltaspike.data.imp > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> l.RepositoryDefinitionException: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Repository creation for > class > > > > class > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> CustomBaseRepository > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> failed. Is > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> it > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> associated with a valid > > > Entity? I > > > > >>>>>> got this > > > > >>>>>> > > > base > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> class > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > for > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> some > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > repositories > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> for some similar behavior: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> public abstract class > > > > >>>>>> CustomBaseRepository > > > > >>>>>> > > <E > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> extends > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> DomainObject<K>, K > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends Serializable> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends > > > > >>>>>> > AbstractEntityRepository<E, > > > > >>>>>> > > K> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> { > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> not sure if this > inheritance > > is > > > > >>>>>> supposed > > > > >>>>>> > to > > > > >>>>>> > > > work > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> with > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > the > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> Repos... > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at > 10:23 > > > AM, > > > > >>>>>> Thomas > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > Andraschko > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > [email protected]> > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> See: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/delt > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> aspike/tree/master/deltaspike/ > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > modules/partial-bean/impl/src/ > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> test/java/org/apache/deltaspik > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > e/test/core/api/partialbean/ > > > > uc008 > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> 2018-04-20 11:22 GMT+02:00 > > > > Thomas > > > > >>>>>> > > Andraschko > > > > >>>>>> > > > < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > [email protected] > > >: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > Interceptors in generell > > > > should > > > > >>>>>> be > > > > >>>>>> > > > supported > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > but > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> only > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > via > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> custom > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> binding - > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > not via "@Interceptors, > > > > >>>>>> @Intercepted > > > > >>>>>> > and > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> @Decorator" > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > 2018-04-20 11:21 > GMT+02:00 > > > > Luís > > > > >>>>>> Alves < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]>: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> So far I found that > > > > >>>>>> @Repository is > > > > >>>>>> > > > actually > > > > >>>>>> > > > > a > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @PartialBeanBinding > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > and > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> I > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> found: "Currently CDI > > > > >>>>>> Interceptors > > > > >>>>>> > > applied > > > > >>>>>> > > > > via > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> @Interceptors, > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> @Intercepted > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> and @Decorator are not > > > > >>>>>> supported by > > > > >>>>>> > our > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > proxies! > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> "...does > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> it > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> means > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> that > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> I'm > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> screwed ;)? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> LA > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at > > > 10:11 > > > > >>>>>> AM, Luís > > > > >>>>>> > > > > Alves < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> [email protected] > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > even with > > > > @ApplicationScoped > > > > >>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>> > > > > interceptor > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> is > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > not > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> working > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > :( > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > can't > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > figure out > why...can't > > > > >>>>>> @Repository > > > > >>>>>> > > > methods > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > be > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> intercepted? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 > at > > > > 9:53 > > > > >>>>>> AM, > > > > >>>>>> > Luís > > > > >>>>>> > > > > Alves > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected]> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> since it's > > proxied...it > > > > >>>>>> should be > > > > >>>>>> > > > OK...I > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> guess > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > it's > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> like > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > Spring's > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> repositories. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 > > at > > > > >>>>>> 9:44 AM, > > > > >>>>>> > Luís > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > Alves < > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected] > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> Hi, > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Repository is > > > @Dependent > > > > >>>>>> > > scoped...and > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > seems > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > that > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @Dependent > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> don't run > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> interceptors, so > > > > >>>>>> > > > @CacheResult(cacheName > > > > >>>>>> > > > > = > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> "my-cache") > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> annotation > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> isn't > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> working :( > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I remember that > some > > > one > > > > >>>>>> proposed > > > > >>>>>> > > that > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > @Repository > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> could/should > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > be > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > > @ApplicationScoped...if > > > > I > > > > >>>>>> change > > > > >>>>>> > > them > > > > >>>>>> > > > > do > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > I > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> have > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > to > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> worry > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> with > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> anything? My > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> EntityManager > > producer > > > is > > > > >>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>> > > > following: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Produces > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @RequestScoped > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> public > > > EntityManager > > > > >>>>>> get() > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> { > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> return > > > > >>>>>> entityManager; > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> } > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I suppose I'll > have a > > > > >>>>>> different EM > > > > >>>>>> > > for > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > each > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> HTTP > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> request / > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> MDB > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> onMessage() / > > > > >>>>>> > > > @Scheduled(cronExpression > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> ="....")...am I > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> correct? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> regards, > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> LA > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
