Good morning,
there's still something weird. Only works when I got the @CustomInterceptor
there.
@CacheResult(cacheName = "loc-cache")
@CustomInterceptor //only seems to work when I have this annotation
here
public Location findLocationById(@CacheKey Integer locId)
{
//just a wrapper for caching...
return findBy(locId);
}
I'm trying to understand from the trace why the @CacheResult is not visible
alone...
addInterceptorBindings(beanManager, bindings,
method.getDeclaredAnnotations()); <--should see all the annotation...
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:11 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Would be great if you could create a issue + unittest, so i can fix it next
> week.
>
> Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves :
>
> > I have to leave :( don't do any change until I can confirm everything ;(
> >
> > have a nice weekend.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > well....I think we might have an issue with the proceed part:
> > >
> > > try {
> > > //Call the annotated method
> > > result = this.proceed(invocation); <-- this is not calling my
> > > method...I think is because the invocation is
> > org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.
> > > impl.invocation.ManualInvocationContext@69b38203 instead of my method
> :(
> > >
> > > any ideas?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> seems to work: org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.im
> > >> pl.invocation.ManualInvocationContext@59fae308
> > >>
> > >> not sure the cache is actually working but I think it's not related
> with
> > >> DS. If possible release a version with the fix:
> > >>
> > >> @ApplicationScoped
> > >> @Specializes
> > >> public class CustomDeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup extends
> > >> InterceptorLookup
> > >> {
> > >>
> > >> @Override
> > >> protected void addInterceptorBindings(BeanManager beanManager,
> > >> ArrayList<Annotation> bindings,
> > >> Annotation[] declaredAnnotations)
> > >> {
> > >> for (Annotation annotation : declaredAnnotations)
> > >> {
> > >> if (bindings.contains(annotation))
> > >> {
> > >> continue;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> Class<? extends Annotation> annotationType =
> > >> annotation.annotationType();
> > >>
> > >> * if (**beanManager.isInterceptorBinding(annotationType))*
> > >> {
> > >> bindings.add(annotation);
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> if (beanManager.isStereotype(annotationType)) *///fun
> part
> > >> is that here is well done ;)*
> > >> {
> > >> for (Annotation subAnnotation :
> > >> annotationType.getDeclaredAnnotations())
> > >> {
> > >> if (bindings.contains(subAnnotation))
> > >> {
> > >> continue;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> if (subAnnotation.annotationType(
> > >> ).isAnnotationPresent(InterceptorBinding.class))
> > >> {
> > >> bindings.add(subAnnotation);
> > >> }
> > >> }
> > >> }
> > >> }
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> Thanks very much Thomas :)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> found this one: org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.im
> > >>> pl.invocation.InterceptorLookup on version 1.8.0
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> where the hell is DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup? which jar I
> have
> > >>>> to import?!
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I'll try....@Specializes on CustomDeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup
> > >>>>> extends DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup should do the trick.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
> > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> https://docs.jboss.org/cdi/api/2.0/javax/enterprise/inject/s
> > >>>>>> pi/BeanManager.html#isInterceptorBinding-java.lang.Class-
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Would be great if you can test it, create a issue and provide a
> > patch.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves :
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> > I have no idea if it's possible or not. Isn't any CDI expert on
> > the
> > >>>>>> mailing
> > >>>>>> > list that want to help? ;)
> > >>>>>> >
> > >>>>>> > https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/enterprise/inject
> /spi/
> > >>>>>> > BeforeBeanDiscovery.html#addInterceptorBinding-javax.enterpr
> > >>>>>> ise.inject.spi
> > >>>>>> > .
> > >>>>>> > AnnotatedType- doesn't make the annotation visible to
> > >>>>>> (annotationType.
> > >>>>>> > isAnnotationPresent(InterceptorBinding.class))...we need some
> > >>>>>> runtime way
> > >>>>>> > to check it...
> > >>>>>> >
> > >>>>>> > BTW if a solutions is found can you make it available on 1.8.2?
> > >>>>>> >
> > >>>>>> >
> > >>>>>> >
> > >>>>>> >
> > >>>>>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
> > >>>>>> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>> >
> > >>>>>> > > Yep, they add the interceptorBinding dynamically:
> > >>>>>> > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI/blob/master/cache-annotations-
> > >>>>>> > > ri/cache-annotations-ri-cdi/src/main/java/org/jsr107/ri/anno
> > >>>>>> tations/cdi/
> > >>>>>> > > InterceptorExtension.java
> > >>>>>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > Just check our code here:
> > >>>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/blob/master/
> > >>>>>> > > deltaspike/modules/proxy/api/src/main/java/org/apache/
> > >>>>>> > > deltaspike/proxy/spi/invocation/DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLo
> ok
> > >>>>>> > up.java#L90
> > >>>>>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > This code would need ask CDI if this annotation is a
> interceptor
> > >>>>>> binding
> > >>>>>> > > (if possible, not sure if it's in the CDI API). Then your case
> > >>>>>> should
> > >>>>>> > work.
> > >>>>>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > 2018-04-20 16:25 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <[email protected]
> >:
> > >>>>>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > This is the reference implementation of the interceptors:
> > >>>>>> > > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI
> > >>>>>> > > > They have:
> > >>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee";
> > >>>>>> > > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
> "
> > >>>>>> > > > xsi:schemaLocation="
> > >>>>>> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
> > >>>>>> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd";>
> > >>>>>> > > > <interceptors>
> > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.
> > >>>>>> > > > CacheResultInterceptor</class>
> > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.
> > >>>>>> > CachePutInterceptor</class>
> > >>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotatio
> ns.cdi.CacheRemoveEntryInterce
> > >>>>>> ptor</
> > >>>>>> > class>
> > >>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotatio
> ns.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercept
> > >>>>>> or</class>
> > >>>>>> > > > </interceptors>
> > >>>>>> > > > </beans>
> > >>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > and they have 2files with:
> > >>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.InterceptorExtension
> > >>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > and
> > >>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CdiAnnotationProviderImpl
> > >>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > The interceptors work on a normal cdi bean.
> > >>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
> > >>>>>> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > AFAIK there 2 ways of using interceptors with CDI:
> > >>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > 1) @InterceptorBinding
> > >>>>>> > > > > 2) @Interceptors(..)
> > >>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > We only support 1) currently.
> > >>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > So i have currently no idea how @CacheResult will work
> even
> > a
> > >>>>>> normal
> > >>>>>> > > CDI
> > >>>>>> > > > > bean. Maybe it's done in Wildfly but not via the "normal"
> > CDI
> > >>>>>> way.
> > >>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > 2018-04-20 15:48 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <
> > [email protected]
> > >>>>>> >:
> > >>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > Submitted: https://github.com/jsr107/
> > jsr107spec/issues/401
> > >>>>>> > > > > > I suppose they will tell the issue is from DS...:(
> > >>>>>> > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Luís Alves <
> > >>>>>> [email protected]
> > >>>>>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > I suppose it's CDI capable.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > Red Hat
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > : Pete Muir <--- is on the expert group
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > * @author Gavin King
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > * @author Pete Muir
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > * @author Antoine Sabot-Durand
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > */
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD, FIELD })
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Retention(RUNTIME)
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Documented
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > @NormalScope
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Inherited
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > public @interface ApplicationScoped {
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > }
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > what I don't understand is how DS look for the
> > >>>>>> interceptors? Can
> > >>>>>> > > you
> > >>>>>> > > > > > point
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > me out the code?
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > Isn't possible to look for all annotations even if
> they
> > >>>>>> don't
> > >>>>>> > have
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > @InterceptorBinding and then look for the registered
> > >>>>>> > interceptors?
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Luís Alves <
> > >>>>>> > [email protected]
> > >>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >> I suppose it's CDI capable.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Andraschko <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> Puh, i wonder why they did it without binding.
> > >>>>>> CacheResult is
> > >>>>>> > > > > actually
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> exactly a binding for the interceptor.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> Is it CDI compatible? Never had a look at the cache
> > API
> > >>>>>> ;)
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> Even there is a bridge or something available (
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> https://github.com/tomitribe/jcache-cdi), i'm not
> > sure
> > >>>>>> if this
> > >>>>>> > > > would
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> work
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> with the limited ability to add interceptors to
> > partial
> > >>>>>> beans.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> I think the best solution for now is to create a own
> > >>>>>> binding.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> 2018-04-20 14:55 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <
> > >>>>>> [email protected]>:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > uhm...that's not good :S
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > the annotation is this one:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > https://static.javadoc.io/java
> > >>>>>> x.cache/cache-api/1.0.0/
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > javax/cache/annotation/CacheResult.html
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > is there a way that using that annotation we get
> the
> > >>>>>> > > interceptor
> > >>>>>> > > > to
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> work?
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > (I can implement the interceptor myself....as I
> said
> > >>>>>> I cannot
> > >>>>>> > > > > modify
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> the
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > annotation as it is javax packge)
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Thomas
> Andraschko <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > Just to be clear: I have no idea how internally
> > >>>>>> CacheResult
> > >>>>>> > > > works
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> but our
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > partial beans only supports CDI interceptors by
> a
> > >>>>>> binding
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > (InterceptorBinding).
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > Everything else, like stated in the doc
> > >>>>>> (@Interceptors,
> > >>>>>> > > > > > @Intercepted,
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > @Decorator), is not supported.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > 2018-04-20 14:31 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > [email protected]
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > In must not work without the
> interceptorbinding.
> > >>>>>> Do you
> > >>>>>> > > mean
> > >>>>>> > > > > that
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> it
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > does
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > work without?
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves
> :
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> can you update your test to remove
> > >>>>>> @InterceptorBinding?
> > >>>>>> > > and
> > >>>>>> > > > > > check
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> if
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > it
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> works?
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> javax.cache.annotation.CacheResult is
> > standard
> > >>>>>> so I
> > >>>>>> > > don't
> > >>>>>> > > > > want
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> to
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > extend
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> it to have the @InterceptorBinding.....if
> this
> > >>>>>> is really
> > >>>>>> > > the
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> problem.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Luís Alves <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Retention(RUNTIME)
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD })
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > // @InterceptorBinding
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > public @interface CustomInterceptor
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > {
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > }
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > I suspect is this
> @InterceptorBinding....but
> > >>>>>> not 100%
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> sure....what
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > is
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> the
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > purpose of that?
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Luís
> Alves <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> don't you want to rewrite your tests with
> > the
> > >>>>>> > > > @CacheResult
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > interceptor
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> ;)
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> ? to see if it works?
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Thomas
> > >>>>>> Andraschko <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> No idea, debug if the interceptor is
> really
> > >>>>>> called
> > >>>>>> > ;)
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 2018-04-20 13:56 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > [email protected]
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > moved the @CustomInterceptor
> declaration
> > >>>>>> of the
> > >>>>>> > > > > > interceptor
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> for
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > the
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> web app
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > beans.xml and now it gets called....SO
> it
> > >>>>>> should
> > >>>>>> > > work
> > >>>>>> > > > > for
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> the
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > cache
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> as
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > well. Any hint?
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Luís
> > >>>>>> Alves <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > [email protected]
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > So I've created a custom one (in fact
> > is
> > >>>>>> a
> > >>>>>> > "copy"
> > >>>>>> > > of
> > >>>>>> > > > > > yours
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > that
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> logs
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> a
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > line):
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Interceptor
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @CustomInterceptor
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public class CustomInterceptorImpl
> > >>>>>> implements
> > >>>>>> > > > > > Serializable
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > {
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private static final long
> > >>>>>> serialVersionUID =
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 7327752605570037403L;
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Inject
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private Logger logger;
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @AroundInvoke
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public Object
> > >>>>>> interceptIt(InvocationContext
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > invocationContext)
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> throws
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > Exception
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > {
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > logger.info("yay :)
> > >>>>>> > CustomInterceptorImpl
> > >>>>>> > > > was
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > called");
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > return
> > >>>>>> invocationContext.proceed();
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > }
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > }
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > registered on the beans.xml (for
> > service
> > >>>>>> and
> > >>>>>> > repo
> > >>>>>> > > > > > layers):
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <?xml version="1.0"
> encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <beans xmlns="
> http://java.sun.com/xml
> > >>>>>> /ns/javaee
> > >>>>>> > "
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> xmlns:xsi="
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSche
> > >>>>>> ma-instance"
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > xsi:schemaLocation="http://
> > >>>>>> > > > > > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jav
> > >>>>>> aee/beans_1_0.xsd
> > >>>>>> > ">
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <interceptors>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati
> > >>>>>> ons.cdi.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > CacheResultInterceptor</class>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ...
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <class>eu.gls.ddtm.config.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > CustomInterceptorImpl</class>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </interceptors>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </beans>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > It's called on the service layer but
> > not
> > >>>>>> on the
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> @Repository :(
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ...I'm using Wildfly 10 (CDI 1.x)...
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:50 AM,
> > Thomas
> > >>>>>> > > Andraschko
> > >>>>>> > > > <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> You can try with a custom
> interceptor
> > >>>>>> and check
> > >>>>>> > > if
> > >>>>>> > > > > it's
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > invoked?
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I assume you don't use
> > weld-2.0.0.Final
> > >>>>>> or
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> weld-2.0.0.SP1? We
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> have a
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> exclusion for this in the unit test
> as
> > >>>>>> there is
> > >>>>>> > > > > > something
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > broken,
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> as you
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> can check in the link i posted
> before.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> Otherwise, it would be great if you
> > >>>>>> could
> > >>>>>> > > provide a
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> unittest
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > for
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> the
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > data
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> module.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I don't have time to prepare it by
> > >>>>>> myself.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> 2018-04-20 12:40 GMT+02:00 Luís
> Alves
> > <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > So far no success...@CacheResult
> on
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @ApplicationScoped
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @Repository
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > public abstract class
> SomeRepository
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > doesn't seem to work :S not sure
> > what
> > >>>>>> I'm
> > >>>>>> > doing
> > >>>>>> > > > > > wrong.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:03 AM,
> > >>>>>> Luís Alves
> > >>>>>> > <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > I ditched the
> CustomBaseRepository
> > >>>>>> for
> > >>>>>> > > > now...but
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> still
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > can't
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> get the
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > cache
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > interceptor to work...here is my
> > >>>>>> beans.xml:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <?xml version="1.0"
> > >>>>>> encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <beans xmlns="
> > http://java.sun.com/
> > >>>>>> > > > xml/ns/javaee"
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > xmlns:xsi="
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSche
> > >>>>>> ma-instance"
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > xsi:schemaLocation="http://
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/
> > >>>>>> > > > javaee/beans_1_0.xsd
> > >>>>>> > > > > ">
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <interceptors>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.
> > >>>>>> > > annotations.cdi.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > CacheResultInterceptor</class>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.
> > >>>>>> > > annotations.cdi.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > CacheRemoveEntryInterceptor</
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> > >>>>>> <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercep
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> tor</
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> > >>>>>> <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CachePutInterceptor</
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> class>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </interceptors>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </beans>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > LA
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:45
> AM,
> > >>>>>> Luís
> > >>>>>> > Alves
> > >>>>>> > > <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Thanks Thomas,
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> if I understood correctly if
> they
> > >>>>>> are on
> > >>>>>> > the
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> bean.xml
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > they
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> should
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> works
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> :)...only annotated one don't
> > work.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> I'm now (not sure why I didn't
> > had
> > >>>>>> it
> > >>>>>> > > before)
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> getting:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> org.apache.deltaspike.data.imp
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> l.RepositoryDefinitionException:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Repository creation for class
> > class
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> CustomBaseRepository
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> failed. Is
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> it
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> associated with a valid
> Entity? I
> > >>>>>> got this
> > >>>>>> > > > base
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> class
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > for
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> some
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > repositories
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> for some similar behavior:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> public abstract class
> > >>>>>> CustomBaseRepository
> > >>>>>> > > <E
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> extends
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> DomainObject<K>, K
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends Serializable>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends
> > >>>>>> > AbstractEntityRepository<E,
> > >>>>>> > > K>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> {
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> not sure if this inheritance is
> > >>>>>> supposed
> > >>>>>> > to
> > >>>>>> > > > work
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> with
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > the
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> Repos...
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:23
> AM,
> > >>>>>> Thomas
> > >>>>>> > > > > > Andraschko
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> [email protected]>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> See:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
> https://github.com/apache/delt
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> aspike/tree/master/deltaspike/
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> modules/partial-bean/impl/src/
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> test/java/org/apache/deltaspik
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> e/test/core/api/partialbean/
> > uc008
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> 2018-04-20 11:22 GMT+02:00
> > Thomas
> > >>>>>> > > Andraschko
> > >>>>>> > > > <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> [email protected]>:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > Interceptors in generell
> > should
> > >>>>>> be
> > >>>>>> > > > supported
> > >>>>>> > > > > > but
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> only
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > via
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> custom
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> binding -
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > not via "@Interceptors,
> > >>>>>> @Intercepted
> > >>>>>> > and
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> @Decorator"
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > 2018-04-20 11:21 GMT+02:00
> > Luís
> > >>>>>> Alves <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]>:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> So far I found that
> > >>>>>> @Repository is
> > >>>>>> > > > actually
> > >>>>>> > > > > a
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @PartialBeanBinding
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > and
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> I
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> found: "Currently CDI
> > >>>>>> Interceptors
> > >>>>>> > > applied
> > >>>>>> > > > > via
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> @Interceptors,
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> @Intercepted
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> and @Decorator are not
> > >>>>>> supported by
> > >>>>>> > our
> > >>>>>> > > > > > proxies!
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> "...does
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> it
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> means
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> that
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> I'm
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> screwed ;)?
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> LA
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at
> 10:11
> > >>>>>> AM, Luís
> > >>>>>> > > > > Alves <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> [email protected]
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > even with
> > @ApplicationScoped
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>>>>> > > > > interceptor
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> is
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > not
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> working
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > :(
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > can't
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > figure out why...can't
> > >>>>>> @Repository
> > >>>>>> > > > methods
> > >>>>>> > > > > > be
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> intercepted?
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at
> > 9:53
> > >>>>>> AM,
> > >>>>>> > Luís
> > >>>>>> > > > > Alves
> > >>>>>> > > > > > <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected]>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> since it's proxied...it
> > >>>>>> should be
> > >>>>>> > > > OK...I
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> guess
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > it's
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> like
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > Spring's
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> repositories.
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at
> > >>>>>> 9:44 AM,
> > >>>>>> > Luís
> > >>>>>> > > > > > Alves <
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected]
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> wrote:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> Hi,
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Repository is
> @Dependent
> > >>>>>> > > scoped...and
> > >>>>>> > > > > > seems
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > that
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @Dependent
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> don't run
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> interceptors, so
> > >>>>>> > > > @CacheResult(cacheName
> > >>>>>> > > > > =
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> "my-cache")
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> annotation
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> isn't
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> working :(
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I remember that some
> one
> > >>>>>> proposed
> > >>>>>> > > that
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > @Repository
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> could/should
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > be
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @ApplicationScoped...if
> > I
> > >>>>>> change
> > >>>>>> > > them
> > >>>>>> > > > > do
> > >>>>>> > > > > > I
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> have
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > to
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> worry
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> with
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> anything? My
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> EntityManager producer
> is
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>>>>> > > > following:
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Produces
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @RequestScoped
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> public
> EntityManager
> > >>>>>> get()
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> {
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> return
> > >>>>>> entityManager;
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> }
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I suppose I'll have a
> > >>>>>> different EM
> > >>>>>> > > for
> > >>>>>> > > > > > each
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> HTTP
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> request /
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> MDB
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> onMessage() /
> > >>>>>> > > > @Scheduled(cronExpression
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> ="....")...am I
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> correct?
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> regards,
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> LA
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>
> > >>>>>> > > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > > >
> > >>>>>> > > >
> > >>>>>> > >
> > >>>>>> >
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
