Would be great if you could create a issue + unittest, so i can fix it next week.
Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves : > I have to leave :( don't do any change until I can confirm everything ;( > > have a nice weekend. > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:12 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]> wrote: > > > well....I think we might have an issue with the proceed part: > > > > try { > > //Call the annotated method > > result = this.proceed(invocation); <-- this is not calling my > > method...I think is because the invocation is > org.apache.deltaspike.proxy. > > impl.invocation.ManualInvocationContext@69b38203 instead of my method :( > > > > any ideas? > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> seems to work: org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.im > >> pl.invocation.ManualInvocationContext@59fae308 > >> > >> not sure the cache is actually working but I think it's not related with > >> DS. If possible release a version with the fix: > >> > >> @ApplicationScoped > >> @Specializes > >> public class CustomDeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup extends > >> InterceptorLookup > >> { > >> > >> @Override > >> protected void addInterceptorBindings(BeanManager beanManager, > >> ArrayList<Annotation> bindings, > >> Annotation[] declaredAnnotations) > >> { > >> for (Annotation annotation : declaredAnnotations) > >> { > >> if (bindings.contains(annotation)) > >> { > >> continue; > >> } > >> > >> Class<? extends Annotation> annotationType = > >> annotation.annotationType(); > >> > >> * if (**beanManager.isInterceptorBinding(annotationType))* > >> { > >> bindings.add(annotation); > >> } > >> > >> if (beanManager.isStereotype(annotationType)) *///fun part > >> is that here is well done ;)* > >> { > >> for (Annotation subAnnotation : > >> annotationType.getDeclaredAnnotations()) > >> { > >> if (bindings.contains(subAnnotation)) > >> { > >> continue; > >> } > >> > >> if (subAnnotation.annotationType( > >> ).isAnnotationPresent(InterceptorBinding.class)) > >> { > >> bindings.add(subAnnotation); > >> } > >> } > >> } > >> } > >> } > >> > >> Thanks very much Thomas :) > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> found this one: org.apache.deltaspike.proxy.im > >>> pl.invocation.InterceptorLookup on version 1.8.0 > >>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> where the hell is DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup? which jar I have > >>>> to import?! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Luís Alves <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I'll try....@Specializes on CustomDeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup > >>>>> extends DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLookup should do the trick. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Thomas Andraschko < > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> https://docs.jboss.org/cdi/api/2.0/javax/enterprise/inject/s > >>>>>> pi/BeanManager.html#isInterceptorBinding-java.lang.Class- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Would be great if you can test it, create a issue and provide a > patch. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves : > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I have no idea if it's possible or not. Isn't any CDI expert on > the > >>>>>> mailing > >>>>>> > list that want to help? ;) > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/enterprise/inject/spi/ > >>>>>> > BeforeBeanDiscovery.html#addInterceptorBinding-javax.enterpr > >>>>>> ise.inject.spi > >>>>>> > . > >>>>>> > AnnotatedType- doesn't make the annotation visible to > >>>>>> (annotationType. > >>>>>> > isAnnotationPresent(InterceptorBinding.class))...we need some > >>>>>> runtime way > >>>>>> > to check it... > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > BTW if a solutions is found can you make it available on 1.8.2? > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Andraschko < > >>>>>> > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Yep, they add the interceptorBinding dynamically: > >>>>>> > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI/blob/master/cache-annotations- > >>>>>> > > ri/cache-annotations-ri-cdi/src/main/java/org/jsr107/ri/anno > >>>>>> tations/cdi/ > >>>>>> > > InterceptorExtension.java > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > Just check our code here: > >>>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/blob/master/ > >>>>>> > > deltaspike/modules/proxy/api/src/main/java/org/apache/ > >>>>>> > > deltaspike/proxy/spi/invocation/DeltaSpikeProxyInterceptorLook > >>>>>> > up.java#L90 > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > This code would need ask CDI if this annotation is a interceptor > >>>>>> binding > >>>>>> > > (if possible, not sure if it's in the CDI API). Then your case > >>>>>> should > >>>>>> > work. > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > 2018-04-20 16:25 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves <[email protected]>: > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > This is the reference implementation of the interceptors: > >>>>>> > > > https://github.com/jsr107/RI > >>>>>> > > > They have: > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"; > >>>>>> > > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; > >>>>>> > > > xsi:schemaLocation=" > >>>>>> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee > >>>>>> > > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd";> > >>>>>> > > > <interceptors> > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi. > >>>>>> > > > CacheResultInterceptor</class> > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi. > >>>>>> > CachePutInterceptor</class> > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CacheRemoveEntryInterce > >>>>>> ptor</ > >>>>>> > class> > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercept > >>>>>> or</class> > >>>>>> > > > </interceptors> > >>>>>> > > > </beans> > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > and they have 2files with: > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.InterceptorExtension > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > and > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > org.jsr107.ri.annotations.cdi.CdiAnnotationProviderImpl > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > The interceptors work on a normal cdi bean. > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Andraschko < > >>>>>> > > > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > AFAIK there 2 ways of using interceptors with CDI: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > 1) @InterceptorBinding > >>>>>> > > > > 2) @Interceptors(..) > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > We only support 1) currently. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > So i have currently no idea how @CacheResult will work even > a > >>>>>> normal > >>>>>> > > CDI > >>>>>> > > > > bean. Maybe it's done in Wildfly but not via the "normal" > CDI > >>>>>> way. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > 2018-04-20 15:48 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves < > [email protected] > >>>>>> >: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > Submitted: https://github.com/jsr107/ > jsr107spec/issues/401 > >>>>>> > > > > > I suppose they will tell the issue is from DS...:( > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Luís Alves < > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > I suppose it's CDI capable. > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107 > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > Red Hat > >>>>>> > > > > > > : Pete Muir <--- is on the expert group > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > * @author Gavin King > >>>>>> > > > > > > * @author Pete Muir > >>>>>> > > > > > > * @author Antoine Sabot-Durand > >>>>>> > > > > > > */ > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD, FIELD }) > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Retention(RUNTIME) > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Documented > >>>>>> > > > > > > @NormalScope > >>>>>> > > > > > > @Inherited > >>>>>> > > > > > > public @interface ApplicationScoped { > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > } > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > what I don't understand is how DS look for the > >>>>>> interceptors? Can > >>>>>> > > you > >>>>>> > > > > > point > >>>>>> > > > > > > me out the code? > >>>>>> > > > > > > Isn't possible to look for all annotations even if they > >>>>>> don't > >>>>>> > have > >>>>>> > > > > > > @InterceptorBinding and then look for the registered > >>>>>> > interceptors? > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Luís Alves < > >>>>>> > [email protected] > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >> I suppose it's CDI capable. > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=107 > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Andraschko < > >>>>>> > > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> Puh, i wonder why they did it without binding. > >>>>>> CacheResult is > >>>>>> > > > > actually > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> exactly a binding for the interceptor. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> Is it CDI compatible? Never had a look at the cache > API > >>>>>> ;) > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> Even there is a bridge or something available ( > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> https://github.com/tomitribe/jcache-cdi), i'm not > sure > >>>>>> if this > >>>>>> > > > would > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> work > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> with the limited ability to add interceptors to > partial > >>>>>> beans. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> I think the best solution for now is to create a own > >>>>>> binding. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> 2018-04-20 14:55 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves < > >>>>>> [email protected]>: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > uhm...that's not good :S > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > the annotation is this one: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > https://static.javadoc.io/java > >>>>>> x.cache/cache-api/1.0.0/ > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > javax/cache/annotation/CacheResult.html > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > is there a way that using that annotation we get the > >>>>>> > > interceptor > >>>>>> > > > to > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> work? > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > (I can implement the interceptor myself....as I said > >>>>>> I cannot > >>>>>> > > > > modify > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> the > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > annotation as it is javax packge) > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Thomas Andraschko < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > Just to be clear: I have no idea how internally > >>>>>> CacheResult > >>>>>> > > > works > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> but our > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > partial beans only supports CDI interceptors by a > >>>>>> binding > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > (InterceptorBinding). > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > Everything else, like stated in the doc > >>>>>> (@Interceptors, > >>>>>> > > > > > @Intercepted, > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > @Decorator), is not supported. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > 2018-04-20 14:31 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > [email protected] > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > In must not work without the interceptorbinding. > >>>>>> Do you > >>>>>> > > mean > >>>>>> > > > > that > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> it > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > does > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > work without? > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > Am Freitag, 20. April 2018 schrieb Luís Alves : > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> can you update your test to remove > >>>>>> @InterceptorBinding? > >>>>>> > > and > >>>>>> > > > > > check > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> if > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > it > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> works? > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> javax.cache.annotation.CacheResult is > standard > >>>>>> so I > >>>>>> > > don't > >>>>>> > > > > want > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> to > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > extend > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> it to have the @InterceptorBinding.....if this > >>>>>> is really > >>>>>> > > the > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> problem. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Luís Alves < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Retention(RUNTIME) > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > @Target({ TYPE, METHOD }) > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > // @InterceptorBinding > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > public @interface CustomInterceptor > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > { > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > } > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > I suspect is this @InterceptorBinding....but > >>>>>> not 100% > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> sure....what > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > is > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> the > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > purpose of that? > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Luís Alves < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected]> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> don't you want to rewrite your tests with > the > >>>>>> > > > @CacheResult > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > interceptor > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> ;) > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> ? to see if it works? > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Thomas > >>>>>> Andraschko < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> No idea, debug if the interceptor is really > >>>>>> called > >>>>>> > ;) > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 2018-04-20 13:56 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves < > >>>>>> > > > > > [email protected] > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> >: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > moved the @CustomInterceptor declaration > >>>>>> of the > >>>>>> > > > > > interceptor > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> for > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > the > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> web app > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > beans.xml and now it gets called....SO it > >>>>>> should > >>>>>> > > work > >>>>>> > > > > for > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> the > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > cache > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> as > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > well. Any hint? > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Luís > >>>>>> Alves < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > [email protected] > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > So I've created a custom one (in fact > is > >>>>>> a > >>>>>> > "copy" > >>>>>> > > of > >>>>>> > > > > > yours > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > that > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> logs > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> a > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > line): > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Interceptor > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @CustomInterceptor > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public class CustomInterceptorImpl > >>>>>> implements > >>>>>> > > > > > Serializable > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > { > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private static final long > >>>>>> serialVersionUID = > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> 7327752605570037403L; > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @Inject > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > private Logger logger; > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > @AroundInvoke > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > public Object > >>>>>> interceptIt(InvocationContext > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > invocationContext) > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> throws > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > Exception > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > { > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > logger.info("yay :) > >>>>>> > CustomInterceptorImpl > >>>>>> > > > was > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > called"); > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > return > >>>>>> invocationContext.proceed(); > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > } > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > } > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > registered on the beans.xml (for > service > >>>>>> and > >>>>>> > repo > >>>>>> > > > > > layers): > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml > >>>>>> /ns/javaee > >>>>>> > " > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> xmlns:xsi=" > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSche > >>>>>> ma-instance" > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > xsi:schemaLocation="http:// > >>>>>> > > > > > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jav > >>>>>> aee/beans_1_0.xsd > >>>>>> > "> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <interceptors> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati > >>>>>> ons.cdi. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > CacheResultInterceptor</class> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ... > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > <class>eu.gls.ddtm.config. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > CustomInterceptorImpl</class> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </interceptors> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > </beans> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > It's called on the service layer but > not > >>>>>> on the > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> @Repository :( > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > ...I'm using Wildfly 10 (CDI 1.x)... > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:50 AM, > Thomas > >>>>>> > > Andraschko > >>>>>> > > > < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> You can try with a custom interceptor > >>>>>> and check > >>>>>> > > if > >>>>>> > > > > it's > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > invoked? > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I assume you don't use > weld-2.0.0.Final > >>>>>> or > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> weld-2.0.0.SP1? We > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> have a > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> exclusion for this in the unit test as > >>>>>> there is > >>>>>> > > > > > something > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > broken, > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> as you > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> can check in the link i posted before. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> Otherwise, it would be great if you > >>>>>> could > >>>>>> > > provide a > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> unittest > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > for > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> the > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > data > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> module. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> I don't have time to prepare it by > >>>>>> myself. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> 2018-04-20 12:40 GMT+02:00 Luís Alves > < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> [email protected] > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > So far no success...@CacheResult on > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @ApplicationScoped > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > @Repository > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > public abstract class SomeRepository > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > doesn't seem to work :S not sure > what > >>>>>> I'm > >>>>>> > doing > >>>>>> > > > > > wrong. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:03 AM, > >>>>>> Luís Alves > >>>>>> > < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > I ditched the CustomBaseRepository > >>>>>> for > >>>>>> > > > now...but > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> still > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > can't > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> get the > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > cache > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > interceptor to work...here is my > >>>>>> beans.xml: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <?xml version="1.0" > >>>>>> encoding="UTF-8"?> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <beans xmlns=" > http://java.sun.com/ > >>>>>> > > > xml/ns/javaee" > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > xmlns:xsi=" > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSche > >>>>>> ma-instance" > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > xsi:schemaLocation="http:// > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/ > >>>>>> > > > javaee/beans_1_0.xsd > >>>>>> > > > > "> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <interceptors> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri. > >>>>>> > > annotations.cdi. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > CacheResultInterceptor</class> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > <class>org.jsr107.ri. > >>>>>> > > annotations.cdi. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > CacheRemoveEntryInterceptor</ > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > >>>>>> <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CacheRemoveAllIntercep > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> tor</ > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > class> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > >>>>>> <class>org.jsr107.ri.annotati > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> ons.cdi.CachePutInterceptor</ > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> class> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </interceptors> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > </beans> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > LA > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:45 AM, > >>>>>> Luís > >>>>>> > Alves > >>>>>> > > < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected] > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Thanks Thomas, > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> if I understood correctly if they > >>>>>> are on > >>>>>> > the > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> bean.xml > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > they > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> should > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> works > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> :)...only annotated one don't > work. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> I'm now (not sure why I didn't > had > >>>>>> it > >>>>>> > > before) > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> getting: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> org.apache.deltaspike.data.imp > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> l.RepositoryDefinitionException: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> Repository creation for class > class > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> CustomBaseRepository > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> failed. Is > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> it > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> associated with a valid Entity? I > >>>>>> got this > >>>>>> > > > base > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> class > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > for > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> some > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > repositories > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> for some similar behavior: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> public abstract class > >>>>>> CustomBaseRepository > >>>>>> > > <E > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> extends > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> DomainObject<K>, K > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends Serializable> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> extends > >>>>>> > AbstractEntityRepository<E, > >>>>>> > > K> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> { > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> not sure if this inheritance is > >>>>>> supposed > >>>>>> > to > >>>>>> > > > work > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> with > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > the > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> Repos... > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM, > >>>>>> Thomas > >>>>>> > > > > > Andraschko > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> [email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> See: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> https://github.com/apache/delt > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> aspike/tree/master/deltaspike/ > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> modules/partial-bean/impl/src/ > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> test/java/org/apache/deltaspik > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> e/test/core/api/partialbean/ > uc008 > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> 2018-04-20 11:22 GMT+02:00 > Thomas > >>>>>> > > Andraschko > >>>>>> > > > < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> [email protected]>: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > Interceptors in generell > should > >>>>>> be > >>>>>> > > > supported > >>>>>> > > > > > but > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> only > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > via > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> custom > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> binding - > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > not via "@Interceptors, > >>>>>> @Intercepted > >>>>>> > and > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> @Decorator" > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > 2018-04-20 11:21 GMT+02:00 > Luís > >>>>>> Alves < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> [email protected]>: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> So far I found that > >>>>>> @Repository is > >>>>>> > > > actually > >>>>>> > > > > a > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @PartialBeanBinding > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > and > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> I > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> found: "Currently CDI > >>>>>> Interceptors > >>>>>> > > applied > >>>>>> > > > > via > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> @Interceptors, > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> @Intercepted > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> and @Decorator are not > >>>>>> supported by > >>>>>> > our > >>>>>> > > > > > proxies! > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> "...does > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> it > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> means > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> that > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> I'm > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> screwed ;)? > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> LA > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:11 > >>>>>> AM, Luís > >>>>>> > > > > Alves < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> [email protected] > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > even with > @ApplicationScoped > >>>>>> the > >>>>>> > > > > interceptor > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> is > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > not > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> working > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > :( > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > can't > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > figure out why...can't > >>>>>> @Repository > >>>>>> > > > methods > >>>>>> > > > > > be > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> intercepted? > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at > 9:53 > >>>>>> AM, > >>>>>> > Luís > >>>>>> > > > > Alves > >>>>>> > > > > > < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected]> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> since it's proxied...it > >>>>>> should be > >>>>>> > > > OK...I > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> guess > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > it's > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> like > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > Spring's > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> repositories. > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at > >>>>>> 9:44 AM, > >>>>>> > Luís > >>>>>> > > > > > Alves < > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > [email protected] > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> wrote: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> Hi, > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Repository is @Dependent > >>>>>> > > scoped...and > >>>>>> > > > > > seems > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > that > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > @Dependent > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> don't run > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> interceptors, so > >>>>>> > > > @CacheResult(cacheName > >>>>>> > > > > = > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> "my-cache") > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> annotation > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> isn't > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> working :( > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I remember that some one > >>>>>> proposed > >>>>>> > > that > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > @Repository > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> could/should > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > be > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @ApplicationScoped...if > I > >>>>>> change > >>>>>> > > them > >>>>>> > > > > do > >>>>>> > > > > > I > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> have > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > to > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> worry > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> with > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> anything? My > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> EntityManager producer is > >>>>>> the > >>>>>> > > > following: > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @Produces > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> @RequestScoped > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> public EntityManager > >>>>>> get() > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> { > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> return > >>>>>> entityManager; > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> } > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> I suppose I'll have a > >>>>>> different EM > >>>>>> > > for > >>>>>> > > > > > each > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> HTTP > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> request / > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> MDB > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> onMessage() / > >>>>>> > > > @Scheduled(cronExpression > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> ="....")...am I > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> correct? > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> regards, > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> LA > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>> > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>>> > > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > >
