4.5.2 was a prerelease version which we accepted it as good enough (no signed RSLs) and never upgraded to 4.6.0. We're now upgrading to Apache 4.9.1 and having this "small" issue.
On 9 July 2013 15:08, David Hamiter <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry to be a bit off topic, but I'm curious, João... where did you find > Flex SDK 4.5.2? Was that a nightly build or something? The only official > 4.5 I can find is 4.5.1.21328A. If your copy of 4.5.2 appears stable, I > would love to get a copy of it. > > David Hamiter > > -----Original Message----- From: João Fernandes > Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 4:27 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: bigger swfs in 4.9.1 > > > Ok, I've compared size-report from 4.5.2 and 4.9.1 and I'm noticing that > both frames have grown in size, 1.1k in frame 1 and 4k in frame 2. > I've noticed that there are 132 new sprite entries and 159 new shape > entries, is this expected? > I've compared 4.5.2 with 4.6.0 and 4.6.0 and they are almost identical (4.6 > produces even better results). > > João Fernandes > > > On 9 July 2013 08:27, João Fernandes <joaopedromartinsfernandes@** > gmail.com <[email protected]>>wrote: > > >> On 9 July 2013 01:51, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> Those shouldn't affect SWF size. But any changes to classes that go in >>> Frame 1 like SystemManager, or in generated code (like the CSS data) >>> could >>> make for larger SWFs. >>> >>> >>> Alex, I don't think it's related to CSS since I see the increase in size >> just by switching SDKs and comparing generated file sizes, unless the >> compiler suffered changes, no? Do you think it will be easier to find the >> culprint comparing report-size files? >> >> -- >> >> João Fernandes >> >> > > > -- > > João Fernandes > -- João Fernandes
