Thanks Alex for your time, I've zipped and sent 2 zip files with those report size files.
Thank you once again for taking a look at it. João Fernandes On 9 July 2013 17:04, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > João, > > > Can you generate a link-report for 4.6 and 4.9.1 and email it to me > directly? > > Are you using Spark DG in the app? I did see additional assets added to > the default DG styles to support drag/drop. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 7/9/13 8:57 AM, "João Fernandes" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >What do you mean Tom? for testing purpose I've compiled the same app / > >modules with both 4.5.2 / 4.6.0 / 4.9.1 and for each file there is a file > >size increase with the exact same build mechanism, where isn't that "an > >issue"? I agree (from the beginning) that it might not be a major issue > >but > >it's one nevertheless. > > > >What I've reported form the size-report is the difference from MXMLC for > >each SDK Version so clearly, the compiler is adding stuff which wasn't > >doing previously. > > > > > >On 9 July 2013 16:21, Tom Chiverton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Given you don't even get the same file from two compiles of the same > >>code > >> at different times, I think 'issue' is stretching it ;-) > >> > >> Tom > >> > >> > >> On 09/07/2013 15:18, João Fernandes wrote: > >> > >>> 4.5.2 was a prerelease version which we accepted it as good enough (no > >>> signed RSLs) and never upgraded to 4.6.0. We're now upgrading to Apache > >>> 4.9.1 and having this "small" issue. > >>> > >>> > >>> On 9 July 2013 15:08, David Hamiter > >>><intoxopox@professorfripples.**com<[email protected]>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Sorry to be a bit off topic, but I'm curious, João... where did you > >>>find > >>>> Flex SDK 4.5.2? Was that a nightly build or something? The only > >>>>official > >>>> 4.5 I can find is 4.5.1.21328A. If your copy of 4.5.2 appears stable, > >>>>I > >>>> would love to get a copy of it. > >>>> > >>>> David Hamiter > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- From: João Fernandes > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 4:27 AM > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Subject: Re: bigger swfs in 4.9.1 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Ok, I've compared size-report from 4.5.2 and 4.9.1 and I'm noticing > >>>>that > >>>> both frames have grown in size, 1.1k in frame 1 and 4k in frame 2. > >>>> I've noticed that there are 132 new sprite entries and 159 new shape > >>>> entries, is this expected? > >>>> I've compared 4.5.2 with 4.6.0 and 4.6.0 and they are almost identical > >>>> (4.6 > >>>> produces even better results). > >>>> > >>>> João Fernandes > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 9 July 2013 08:27, João Fernandes <joaopedromartinsfernandes@** > >>>> gmail.com > >>>><joaopedromartinsfernandes@**gmail.com > <joaopedromartinsfernandes@gmail. > >>>>com> > >>>> >>wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 9 July 2013 01:51, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Those shouldn't affect SWF size. But any changes to classes that > >>>>>go in > >>>>>> Frame 1 like SystemManager, or in generated code (like the CSS data) > >>>>>> could > >>>>>> make for larger SWFs. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Alex, I don't think it's related to CSS since I see the increase > >>>>>>in > >>>>>> size > >>>>>> > >>>>> just by switching SDKs and comparing generated file sizes, unless the > >>>>> compiler suffered changes, no? Do you think it will be easier to find > >>>>> the > >>>>> culprint comparing report-size files? > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> > >>>>> João Fernandes > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> > >>>> João Fernandes > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > >-- > > > >João Fernandes > > -- João Fernandes
