What do you mean Tom? for testing purpose I've compiled the same app / modules with both 4.5.2 / 4.6.0 / 4.9.1 and for each file there is a file size increase with the exact same build mechanism, where isn't that "an issue"? I agree (from the beginning) that it might not be a major issue but it's one nevertheless.
What I've reported form the size-report is the difference from MXMLC for each SDK Version so clearly, the compiler is adding stuff which wasn't doing previously. On 9 July 2013 16:21, Tom Chiverton <[email protected]> wrote: > Given you don't even get the same file from two compiles of the same code > at different times, I think 'issue' is stretching it ;-) > > Tom > > > On 09/07/2013 15:18, João Fernandes wrote: > >> 4.5.2 was a prerelease version which we accepted it as good enough (no >> signed RSLs) and never upgraded to 4.6.0. We're now upgrading to Apache >> 4.9.1 and having this "small" issue. >> >> >> On 9 July 2013 15:08, David Hamiter >> <intoxopox@professorfripples.**com<[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >> Sorry to be a bit off topic, but I'm curious, João... where did you find >>> Flex SDK 4.5.2? Was that a nightly build or something? The only official >>> 4.5 I can find is 4.5.1.21328A. If your copy of 4.5.2 appears stable, I >>> would love to get a copy of it. >>> >>> David Hamiter >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: João Fernandes >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 4:27 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: bigger swfs in 4.9.1 >>> >>> >>> Ok, I've compared size-report from 4.5.2 and 4.9.1 and I'm noticing that >>> both frames have grown in size, 1.1k in frame 1 and 4k in frame 2. >>> I've noticed that there are 132 new sprite entries and 159 new shape >>> entries, is this expected? >>> I've compared 4.5.2 with 4.6.0 and 4.6.0 and they are almost identical >>> (4.6 >>> produces even better results). >>> >>> João Fernandes >>> >>> >>> On 9 July 2013 08:27, João Fernandes <joaopedromartinsfernandes@** >>> gmail.com >>> <joaopedromartinsfernandes@**gmail.com<[email protected]> >>> >>wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 9 July 2013 01:51, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Those shouldn't affect SWF size. But any changes to classes that go in >>>>> Frame 1 like SystemManager, or in generated code (like the CSS data) >>>>> could >>>>> make for larger SWFs. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Alex, I don't think it's related to CSS since I see the increase in >>>>> size >>>>> >>>> just by switching SDKs and comparing generated file sizes, unless the >>>> compiler suffered changes, no? Do you think it will be easier to find >>>> the >>>> culprint comparing report-size files? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> João Fernandes >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> >>> João Fernandes >>> >>> >> >> > -- João Fernandes
