João,
The mail filters blocked it. Try making the suffix of the link reports something like .xml or .txt and send again. I think it doesn't like .lnk. Thanks, -Alex On 7/9/13 9:25 AM, "João Fernandes" <[email protected]> wrote: >Thanks Alex for your time, I've zipped and sent 2 zip files with those >report size files. > >Thank you once again for taking a look at it. > >João Fernandes > > >On 9 July 2013 17:04, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > >> João, >> >> >> Can you generate a link-report for 4.6 and 4.9.1 and email it to me >> directly? >> >> Are you using Spark DG in the app? I did see additional assets added to >> the default DG styles to support drag/drop. >> >> Thanks, >> -Alex >> >> On 7/9/13 8:57 AM, "João Fernandes" >><[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >What do you mean Tom? for testing purpose I've compiled the same app / >> >modules with both 4.5.2 / 4.6.0 / 4.9.1 and for each file there is a >>file >> >size increase with the exact same build mechanism, where isn't that "an >> >issue"? I agree (from the beginning) that it might not be a major issue >> >but >> >it's one nevertheless. >> > >> >What I've reported form the size-report is the difference from MXMLC >>for >> >each SDK Version so clearly, the compiler is adding stuff which wasn't >> >doing previously. >> > >> > >> >On 9 July 2013 16:21, Tom Chiverton <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Given you don't even get the same file from two compiles of the same >> >>code >> >> at different times, I think 'issue' is stretching it ;-) >> >> >> >> Tom >> >> >> >> >> >> On 09/07/2013 15:18, João Fernandes wrote: >> >> >> >>> 4.5.2 was a prerelease version which we accepted it as good enough >>(no >> >>> signed RSLs) and never upgraded to 4.6.0. We're now upgrading to >>Apache >> >>> 4.9.1 and having this "small" issue. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 9 July 2013 15:08, David Hamiter >> >>><intoxopox@professorfripples.**com<[email protected]>> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Sorry to be a bit off topic, but I'm curious, João... where did you >> >>>find >> >>>> Flex SDK 4.5.2? Was that a nightly build or something? The only >> >>>>official >> >>>> 4.5 I can find is 4.5.1.21328A. If your copy of 4.5.2 appears >>stable, >> >>>>I >> >>>> would love to get a copy of it. >> >>>> >> >>>> David Hamiter >> >>>> >> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: João Fernandes >> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 4:27 AM >> >>>> To: [email protected] >> >>>> Subject: Re: bigger swfs in 4.9.1 >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Ok, I've compared size-report from 4.5.2 and 4.9.1 and I'm noticing >> >>>>that >> >>>> both frames have grown in size, 1.1k in frame 1 and 4k in frame 2. >> >>>> I've noticed that there are 132 new sprite entries and 159 new >>shape >> >>>> entries, is this expected? >> >>>> I've compared 4.5.2 with 4.6.0 and 4.6.0 and they are almost >>identical >> >>>> (4.6 >> >>>> produces even better results). >> >>>> >> >>>> João Fernandes >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On 9 July 2013 08:27, João Fernandes <joaopedromartinsfernandes@** >> >>>> gmail.com >> >>>><joaopedromartinsfernandes@**gmail.com >> <joaopedromartinsfernandes@gmail. >> >>>>com> >> >>>> >>wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On 9 July 2013 01:51, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Those shouldn't affect SWF size. But any changes to classes that >> >>>>>go in >> >>>>>> Frame 1 like SystemManager, or in generated code (like the CSS >>data) >> >>>>>> could >> >>>>>> make for larger SWFs. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Alex, I don't think it's related to CSS since I see the >>increase >> >>>>>>in >> >>>>>> size >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> just by switching SDKs and comparing generated file sizes, unless >>the >> >>>>> compiler suffered changes, no? Do you think it will be easier to >>find >> >>>>> the >> >>>>> culprint comparing report-size files? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> >> >>>>> João Fernandes >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> >> >>>> João Fernandes >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> >-- >> > >> >João Fernandes >> >> > > >-- > >João Fernandes
