Hi João, I'm looking for the -link-reports, not the size reports.
Thanks, -Alex On 7/9/13 9:37 AM, "João Fernandes" <[email protected]> wrote: >Ok done! > >Thanks! > > >On 9 July 2013 17:28, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > >> João, >> >> >> The mail filters blocked it. Try making the suffix of the link reports >> something like .xml or .txt and send again. I think it doesn't like >>.lnk. >> >> Thanks, >> -Alex >> >> >> On 7/9/13 9:25 AM, "João Fernandes" >><[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >Thanks Alex for your time, I've zipped and sent 2 zip files with those >> >report size files. >> > >> >Thank you once again for taking a look at it. >> > >> >João Fernandes >> > >> > >> >On 9 July 2013 17:04, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> João, >> >> >> >> >> >> Can you generate a link-report for 4.6 and 4.9.1 and email it to me >> >> directly? >> >> >> >> Are you using Spark DG in the app? I did see additional assets >>added to >> >> the default DG styles to support drag/drop. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Alex >> >> >> >> On 7/9/13 8:57 AM, "João Fernandes" >> >><[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >What do you mean Tom? for testing purpose I've compiled the same >>app / >> >> >modules with both 4.5.2 / 4.6.0 / 4.9.1 and for each file there is a >> >>file >> >> >size increase with the exact same build mechanism, where isn't that >>"an >> >> >issue"? I agree (from the beginning) that it might not be a major >>issue >> >> >but >> >> >it's one nevertheless. >> >> > >> >> >What I've reported form the size-report is the difference from MXMLC >> >>for >> >> >each SDK Version so clearly, the compiler is adding stuff which >>wasn't >> >> >doing previously. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >On 9 July 2013 16:21, Tom Chiverton <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Given you don't even get the same file from two compiles of the >>same >> >> >>code >> >> >> at different times, I think 'issue' is stretching it ;-) >> >> >> >> >> >> Tom >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 09/07/2013 15:18, João Fernandes wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> 4.5.2 was a prerelease version which we accepted it as good >>enough >> >>(no >> >> >>> signed RSLs) and never upgraded to 4.6.0. We're now upgrading to >> >>Apache >> >> >>> 4.9.1 and having this "small" issue. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On 9 July 2013 15:08, David Hamiter >> >> >>>>><intoxopox@professorfripples.**com<[email protected]>> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Sorry to be a bit off topic, but I'm curious, João... where did >>you >> >> >>>find >> >> >>>> Flex SDK 4.5.2? Was that a nightly build or something? The only >> >> >>>>official >> >> >>>> 4.5 I can find is 4.5.1.21328A. If your copy of 4.5.2 appears >> >>stable, >> >> >>>>I >> >> >>>> would love to get a copy of it. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> David Hamiter >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: João Fernandes >> >> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 4:27 AM >> >> >>>> To: [email protected] >> >> >>>> Subject: Re: bigger swfs in 4.9.1 >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Ok, I've compared size-report from 4.5.2 and 4.9.1 and I'm >>noticing >> >> >>>>that >> >> >>>> both frames have grown in size, 1.1k in frame 1 and 4k in frame >>2. >> >> >>>> I've noticed that there are 132 new sprite entries and 159 new >> >>shape >> >> >>>> entries, is this expected? >> >> >>>> I've compared 4.5.2 with 4.6.0 and 4.6.0 and they are almost >> >>identical >> >> >>>> (4.6 >> >> >>>> produces even better results). >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> João Fernandes >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> On 9 July 2013 08:27, João Fernandes >><joaopedromartinsfernandes@** >> >> >>>> gmail.com >> >> >>>><joaopedromartinsfernandes@**gmail.com >> >> <joaopedromartinsfernandes@gmail. >> >> >>>>com> >> >> >>>> >>wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> On 9 July 2013 01:51, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Those shouldn't affect SWF size. But any changes to classes >>that >> >> >>>>>go in >> >> >>>>>> Frame 1 like SystemManager, or in generated code (like the CSS >> >>data) >> >> >>>>>> could >> >> >>>>>> make for larger SWFs. >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Alex, I don't think it's related to CSS since I see the >> >>increase >> >> >>>>>>in >> >> >>>>>> size >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>> just by switching SDKs and comparing generated file sizes, >>unless >> >>the >> >> >>>>> compiler suffered changes, no? Do you think it will be easier >>to >> >>find >> >> >>>>> the >> >> >>>>> culprint comparing report-size files? >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> -- >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> João Fernandes >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>> -- >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> João Fernandes >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >-- >> >> > >> >> >João Fernandes >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >-- >> > >> >João Fernandes >> >> > > >-- > >João Fernandes
