Given you don't even get the same file from two compiles of the same
code at different times, I think 'issue' is stretching it ;-)
Tom
On 09/07/2013 15:18, João Fernandes wrote:
4.5.2 was a prerelease version which we accepted it as good enough (no
signed RSLs) and never upgraded to 4.6.0. We're now upgrading to Apache
4.9.1 and having this "small" issue.
On 9 July 2013 15:08, David Hamiter <[email protected]> wrote:
Sorry to be a bit off topic, but I'm curious, João... where did you find
Flex SDK 4.5.2? Was that a nightly build or something? The only official
4.5 I can find is 4.5.1.21328A. If your copy of 4.5.2 appears stable, I
would love to get a copy of it.
David Hamiter
-----Original Message----- From: João Fernandes
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 4:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: bigger swfs in 4.9.1
Ok, I've compared size-report from 4.5.2 and 4.9.1 and I'm noticing that
both frames have grown in size, 1.1k in frame 1 and 4k in frame 2.
I've noticed that there are 132 new sprite entries and 159 new shape
entries, is this expected?
I've compared 4.5.2 with 4.6.0 and 4.6.0 and they are almost identical (4.6
produces even better results).
João Fernandes
On 9 July 2013 08:27, João Fernandes <joaopedromartinsfernandes@**
gmail.com <[email protected]>>wrote:
On 9 July 2013 01:51, Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:
Those shouldn't affect SWF size. But any changes to classes that go in
Frame 1 like SystemManager, or in generated code (like the CSS data)
could
make for larger SWFs.
Alex, I don't think it's related to CSS since I see the increase in size
just by switching SDKs and comparing generated file sizes, unless the
compiler suffered changes, no? Do you think it will be easier to find the
culprint comparing report-size files?
--
João Fernandes
--
João Fernandes
