G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
In what way? Both Jonathon and I tried to point the OP in the right
direction and I think we did. What we cannot do is do the work.
Furthermore, the list archives have the solution time and time again and
it takes little time and effort to do a search of these.
So you tell us what would have been better.
Gerry, I don't thing Frank or Jonathon are criticizing your assistance,
but rather the way the program is set up vis-a-vis languages and styles.
A lot of people seem to have problems with this as evidenced by the
number of questions this list sees on the topic.
There was a discussion some time back about perhaps separating the
language property from the general Styles framework or in some other way
making this stuff more intuitive and user-friendly.
I don't know whether the paradigm needs to be changed or how exactly it
should be changed, but I do think it is an unfortunate design choice to
make the user select the language in multiple locations in order to
affect the desired results.
Just my $0.02 worth.
--
Rod
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
