[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tuesday 26 June 2007 16:02:17 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> There are hidden costs. For one, a VERY buggy office suite. >> > > That gives a lot of useful detail, NOT! Where are your examples? > > >> I am using it for a business now, piloting the software as my >> company is considereing switching. >> > > Translation = you were told to do this and you don't want to because > you like the way things are so you are going to do everything you > can to discourage the management from switching. One of the best > things your employer can do to cut costs is... fire you. > > >> I can 99.9% guarantee you >> that the cost you pay in time dealing with bugs and design flaws >> is much more costly than just buying MS Office. >> > > Where is your evidence, reports, examples, details, analysis etc. > etc.? I have been using Openoffice for five years with no problems. > > >> If you care about your data, don't use OpenOffice. >> > > For those of you that don't know or can't see it, this is just FUD. > If you don't know what FUD is, it is Fear Uncertainty Doubt. A very > effective form of sabotage against a competitor, by scaring people > into not using a competitor's product or service or voting for > them. > > The windbag has nothing of value to share. So, don't feed the troll. > > >
I agree, but still you do have to give him the chance to make his case, if only in the name of courtesy. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
