Hi *, 2008/1/4, NoOp wrote: > On 01/03/2008 12:16 AM, M. Fioretti wrote: > > [...] > > > > 1) it is really, really inefficient to let pass tenths of message with > > highly informative subjects like: > > > > [users] [moderated] > > [users] [moderated] YOU MUST GIVE A SUMMARY HERE
... explicit consent ... > > 2) it is MUCH worse when volunteers _answer_ such messages without > > changing the subject to indicate what the actual content is, ie > > making it much more visible both to other subscribers and in > > archive searches. ... silent consent ... [see my replies 2008-01-03 10:27:27 GMT 2008-01-03 10:40:15 GMT 2008-01-03 13:01:30 GMT] As you see, Google Mail kicks it out of the thread (that may be a difficulty with 'account-specific' inline/online reply); with mail client Thunderbird the reply remains with the thread ... > When you add something to the subject, and this is a good idea, *please* > leave the [moderated] or [users] tag in place. Some (many?) of us that > do assist unsubscribed posts do not wish to wade through each header to > find out if the post is subscribed or not. The [users] and [moderated] > tags flag that it is from an unsubscribed user, so it is easy to then cc > the poster without having to look at the headers. ... explicit consent (common consent?) ... How about to gain some experience - trial and error ;-) Manfred --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
