On 22/01/2008, James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, mention that sticking with Microsoft operating systems means > replacing hardware whenever a new version of Windows comes out. These > same systems are more than adaquate for running Linux. So, by > encouraging use of Windows, they are contributing to a significant waste > of resources and the generation of a lot of garbage. Then we get to the > additional electricity required to power those new, faster computers. > > It seems to me, an environmental organization should be concerned about > such things.
While that may be the case, I'd like to know about the direct environmental impact of MS Office, not other MS products. I don't want to convince them to switch OS, rather, I want to convince them to send newsletters in a non-MSO format. Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
