> On May 30, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Bill Cole > <sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote: > > On 30 May 2018, at 10:00, Palvelin Postmaster wrote: > >>> On 30 May 2018, at 16:48, Antony Stone >>> <antony.st...@spamassassin.open.source.it> wrote: >>> >>> On Wednesday 30 May 2018 at 15:33:13, Palvelin Postmaster wrote: >>> >>>>> On 30 May 2018, at 16:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 30.05.18 15:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote: >>>>>> Hitting reply sends the response to poster directly >>>>> >>>>> get a mail client that supports mailing lists. Mozilla should do. >>>> >>>> I see, the 'Mozzilla or stfu' policy ;D >>> >>> No, Mozilla was just one example; there are many. >>> >>> I, for example, use KMail >> >> My Apple Mail/iPhone/iPad clients don’t. They all appear to be among Top 10 >> email clients (https://emailclientmarketshare.com). > > Which is unfortunate, because Apple Mail generally sucks. It seems to have > been put under the control of people who think Outlook 2003 was the pinnacle > of email clients. For MacOS, there are far better alternatives that include > Mozilla and MailMate. For iOS not so much, sadly.
All email clients “generally suck”. Thunderbird is not even actively developed anymore last I checked, so that’s not really an option. And if you can imagine this, both Thunderbird and MailMate choke on large mailboxes *even more* than Mail.app does. If I had a better option than some old command-line mess, I’d use it. Every 3-4 years I go on a hunt for a new Mac mail client and I always come up empty. I’ve tried MailMate, Thunderbird, Postbox and just keep coming back to the (neglected) Mail.app. I’m all ears if there’s something out there that can deal with 5 or 6 really large accounts well, AND does the right thing with mailing lists, I’m all ears. I’ve not tried Outlook for Mac yet, maybe that’s the ticket? :) Charles ps - this email I’m replying to has a “Reply-To” header and Mail.app followed it. > > Any mail client that does not have an easy way to view messages in raw > RFC5322, to create messages that follow RFC3676, and to set Reply-To and From > headers arbitrarily is unfit for use in the modern world no matter how many > people use it because switching is hard. > >> I wonder if Gmail, Outlook variants and the Android mail clients do? > > K9Mail for Android did, when last I used Android (many years ago.) Modern > Outlook on Windows does (or did, as of 2010.) I don't think I've ever used > the GMail web interface for anything beyond testing the GMail web interface, > so I can't speak to it as a MUA for mailing lists.
