On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> There are other reasons not to do this, for instance legal ones.
Again, you are quoting arguments that favor SMTP reject. It is better to
reject a mail, so that legitimate senders know it, rather than have them
believe it was delivered when it was sent into a spam folder...
This is one of the stupidest arguments in this thread
Well, hey, now that we've got *that* off our chest....
NOBODY is "legally required" to accept e-mail. That is a crock of
baloney.
Well then it's a good thing I didn't say that, isn't it?
It is NOT "illegal" to break a contract.
It's called 'fraud'. Look it up.
- C
