The way most (if not all) Wicket committers keep track of this list (and all other mailing lists for that matter) is to use gmail as their list reading platform. The threaded view of gmail is unsurpassed IMO. I have 0 unread Wicket messages on all lists I'm subscribed to: user, dev, commits, private, wicketstuff-user, wicketstuff-dev
Martijn On 1/29/08, Curtis Cooley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > On 1/29/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Remember, these mailing > > > >> lists are used by thousands of people all over the world and they're > >> here for a specific reason, to learn about Wicket (or to help others). > >> > > > > > > > > Remember that we are all humans, and that the social interactions > between > > people is what makes a community thrive, as long as it is respectful and > > open. The occasional personal wish, note or other social interaction > that > > happens on the list makes us remember that we are human, and a > community. > > > > I think in this case the sharing was not off limits, and I hate to see > our > > list go down a route where we take out any and all personal interactions > and > > have to limit ourselves to the java problem du jour. > > > > What we do need to be careful of is that it transcends into mostly > personal > > chitchat. However I don't see that happening anytime soon. The number of > > w00t ftw and other messages is pretty low, as are the number of personal > > life sharing. > > > > > > Yes these messages are better suited to personal blogs or private > messages, > > however I am not willing to start a police hunt or moderation effort to > > remove any and all personal sharing on these lists. > > > > > This is a delicate problem. I rarely ever contribute since I'm still > learning and I really appreciate the complete answers I get when I ask > questions; however it is very difficult for me to follow this list. > Perhaps to some it doesn't seem high volume, but it easily triples all > the other mail I get. To me anything that perhaps improves the signal to > noise ratio helps. > > That said, I wouldn't want it turned into what advanced-servlets turned > into. That list was basically dead quiet and whenever someone did ask a > question there was a 90% chance the responses would be two page > diatribes on how that question was not an advanced-servlet question. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0
