wicket stuff does not have a separate mailinglist anymore, just use the wicket userlist
Maurice On Jan 29, 2008 10:37 PM, Robby O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Strike that. > > > Robby O'Connor wrote: > > Isn't it just a SF mailing list? I'd say via the sf project page? > > > > Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote: > >> Where do I sign up for wicketstuff-user and wicketstuff-dev? > >> > >> Is this mentioned on the wicketstuff wiki? > >> > >> -regards Nino > >> > >> Martijn Dashorst wrote: > >>> The way most (if not all) Wicket committers keep track of this list > >>> (and all > >>> other mailing lists for that matter) is to use gmail as their list > >>> reading > >>> platform. The threaded view of gmail is unsurpassed IMO. > >>> I have 0 unread Wicket messages on all lists I'm subscribed to: user, > >>> dev, > >>> commits, private, wicketstuff-user, wicketstuff-dev > >>> > >>> Martijn > >>> > >>> On 1/29/08, Curtis Cooley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 1/29/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Remember, these mailing > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> lists are used by thousands of people all over the world and they're > >>>>>> here for a specific reason, to learn about Wicket (or to help others). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> Remember that we are all humans, and that the social interactions > >>>>> > >>>> between > >>>> > >>>>> people is what makes a community thrive, as long as it is respectful > >>>>> and > >>>>> open. The occasional personal wish, note or other social interaction > >>>>> > >>>> that > >>>> > >>>>> happens on the list makes us remember that we are human, and a > >>>>> > >>>> community. > >>>> > >>>>> I think in this case the sharing was not off limits, and I hate to see > >>>>> > >>>> our > >>>> > >>>>> list go down a route where we take out any and all personal > >>>>> interactions > >>>>> > >>>> and > >>>> > >>>>> have to limit ourselves to the java problem du jour. > >>>>> > >>>>> What we do need to be careful of is that it transcends into mostly > >>>>> > >>>> personal > >>>> > >>>>> chitchat. However I don't see that happening anytime soon. The > >>>>> number of > >>>>> w00t ftw and other messages is pretty low, as are the number of > >>>>> personal > >>>>> life sharing. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes these messages are better suited to personal blogs or private > >>>>> > >>>> messages, > >>>> > >>>>> however I am not willing to start a police hunt or moderation effort to > >>>>> remove any and all personal sharing on these lists. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> This is a delicate problem. I rarely ever contribute since I'm still > >>>> learning and I really appreciate the complete answers I get when I ask > >>>> questions; however it is very difficult for me to follow this list. > >>>> Perhaps to some it doesn't seem high volume, but it easily triples all > >>>> the other mail I get. To me anything that perhaps improves the signal to > >>>> noise ratio helps. > >>>> > >>>> That said, I wouldn't want it turned into what advanced-servlets turned > >>>> into. That list was basically dead quiet and whenever someone did ask a > >>>> question there was a 90% chance the responses would be two page > >>>> diatribes on how that question was not an advanced-servlet question. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
