a big +1 from me, dont know how i would deal with all this traffic without gmail...
-igor On Jan 29, 2008 8:26 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The way most (if not all) Wicket committers keep track of this list (and all > other mailing lists for that matter) is to use gmail as their list reading > platform. The threaded view of gmail is unsurpassed IMO. > I have 0 unread Wicket messages on all lists I'm subscribed to: user, dev, > commits, private, wicketstuff-user, wicketstuff-dev > > Martijn > > > On 1/29/08, Curtis Cooley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > > On 1/29/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Remember, these mailing > > > > > >> lists are used by thousands of people all over the world and they're > > >> here for a specific reason, to learn about Wicket (or to help others). > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Remember that we are all humans, and that the social interactions > > between > > > people is what makes a community thrive, as long as it is respectful and > > > open. The occasional personal wish, note or other social interaction > > that > > > happens on the list makes us remember that we are human, and a > > community. > > > > > > I think in this case the sharing was not off limits, and I hate to see > > our > > > list go down a route where we take out any and all personal interactions > > and > > > have to limit ourselves to the java problem du jour. > > > > > > What we do need to be careful of is that it transcends into mostly > > personal > > > chitchat. However I don't see that happening anytime soon. The number of > > > w00t ftw and other messages is pretty low, as are the number of personal > > > life sharing. > > > > > > > > > Yes these messages are better suited to personal blogs or private > > messages, > > > however I am not willing to start a police hunt or moderation effort to > > > remove any and all personal sharing on these lists. > > > > > > > > This is a delicate problem. I rarely ever contribute since I'm still > > learning and I really appreciate the complete answers I get when I ask > > questions; however it is very difficult for me to follow this list. > > Perhaps to some it doesn't seem high volume, but it easily triples all > > the other mail I get. To me anything that perhaps improves the signal to > > noise ratio helps. > > > > That said, I wouldn't want it turned into what advanced-servlets turned > > into. That list was basically dead quiet and whenever someone did ask a > > question there was a 90% chance the responses would be two page > > diatribes on how that question was not an advanced-servlet question. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
