Isn't it just a SF mailing list? I'd say via the sf project page? Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote: > Where do I sign up for wicketstuff-user and wicketstuff-dev? > > Is this mentioned on the wicketstuff wiki? > > -regards Nino > > Martijn Dashorst wrote: >> The way most (if not all) Wicket committers keep track of this list >> (and all >> other mailing lists for that matter) is to use gmail as their list >> reading >> platform. The threaded view of gmail is unsurpassed IMO. >> I have 0 unread Wicket messages on all lists I'm subscribed to: user, >> dev, >> commits, private, wicketstuff-user, wicketstuff-dev >> >> Martijn >> >> On 1/29/08, Curtis Cooley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Martijn Dashorst wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/29/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Remember, these mailing >>>> >>>> >>>>> lists are used by thousands of people all over the world and they're >>>>> here for a specific reason, to learn about Wicket (or to help others). >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Remember that we are all humans, and that the social interactions >>>> >>> between >>> >>>> people is what makes a community thrive, as long as it is respectful >>>> and >>>> open. The occasional personal wish, note or other social interaction >>>> >>> that >>> >>>> happens on the list makes us remember that we are human, and a >>>> >>> community. >>> >>>> I think in this case the sharing was not off limits, and I hate to see >>>> >>> our >>> >>>> list go down a route where we take out any and all personal >>>> interactions >>>> >>> and >>> >>>> have to limit ourselves to the java problem du jour. >>>> >>>> What we do need to be careful of is that it transcends into mostly >>>> >>> personal >>> >>>> chitchat. However I don't see that happening anytime soon. The >>>> number of >>>> w00t ftw and other messages is pretty low, as are the number of >>>> personal >>>> life sharing. >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes these messages are better suited to personal blogs or private >>>> >>> messages, >>> >>>> however I am not willing to start a police hunt or moderation effort to >>>> remove any and all personal sharing on these lists. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> This is a delicate problem. I rarely ever contribute since I'm still >>> learning and I really appreciate the complete answers I get when I ask >>> questions; however it is very difficult for me to follow this list. >>> Perhaps to some it doesn't seem high volume, but it easily triples all >>> the other mail I get. To me anything that perhaps improves the signal to >>> noise ratio helps. >>> >>> That said, I wouldn't want it turned into what advanced-servlets turned >>> into. That list was basically dead quiet and whenever someone did ask a >>> question there was a 90% chance the responses would be two page >>> diatribes on how that question was not an advanced-servlet question. >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
