Strike that. Robby O'Connor wrote: > Isn't it just a SF mailing list? I'd say via the sf project page? > > Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote: >> Where do I sign up for wicketstuff-user and wicketstuff-dev? >> >> Is this mentioned on the wicketstuff wiki? >> >> -regards Nino >> >> Martijn Dashorst wrote: >>> The way most (if not all) Wicket committers keep track of this list >>> (and all >>> other mailing lists for that matter) is to use gmail as their list >>> reading >>> platform. The threaded view of gmail is unsurpassed IMO. >>> I have 0 unread Wicket messages on all lists I'm subscribed to: user, >>> dev, >>> commits, private, wicketstuff-user, wicketstuff-dev >>> >>> Martijn >>> >>> On 1/29/08, Curtis Cooley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/29/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Remember, these mailing >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> lists are used by thousands of people all over the world and they're >>>>>> here for a specific reason, to learn about Wicket (or to help others). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Remember that we are all humans, and that the social interactions >>>>> >>>> between >>>> >>>>> people is what makes a community thrive, as long as it is respectful >>>>> and >>>>> open. The occasional personal wish, note or other social interaction >>>>> >>>> that >>>> >>>>> happens on the list makes us remember that we are human, and a >>>>> >>>> community. >>>> >>>>> I think in this case the sharing was not off limits, and I hate to see >>>>> >>>> our >>>> >>>>> list go down a route where we take out any and all personal >>>>> interactions >>>>> >>>> and >>>> >>>>> have to limit ourselves to the java problem du jour. >>>>> >>>>> What we do need to be careful of is that it transcends into mostly >>>>> >>>> personal >>>> >>>>> chitchat. However I don't see that happening anytime soon. The >>>>> number of >>>>> w00t ftw and other messages is pretty low, as are the number of >>>>> personal >>>>> life sharing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes these messages are better suited to personal blogs or private >>>>> >>>> messages, >>>> >>>>> however I am not willing to start a police hunt or moderation effort to >>>>> remove any and all personal sharing on these lists. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> This is a delicate problem. I rarely ever contribute since I'm still >>>> learning and I really appreciate the complete answers I get when I ask >>>> questions; however it is very difficult for me to follow this list. >>>> Perhaps to some it doesn't seem high volume, but it easily triples all >>>> the other mail I get. To me anything that perhaps improves the signal to >>>> noise ratio helps. >>>> >>>> That said, I wouldn't want it turned into what advanced-servlets turned >>>> into. That list was basically dead quiet and whenever someone did ask a >>>> question there was a 90% chance the responses would be two page >>>> diatribes on how that question was not an advanced-servlet question. >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
