ahh ok, I thought so.. but got in doubt..

Maurice Marrink wrote:
wicket stuff does not have a separate mailinglist anymore, just use
the wicket userlist

Maurice

On Jan 29, 2008 10:37 PM, Robby O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Strike that.


Robby O'Connor wrote:
Isn't it just a SF mailing list? I'd say via the sf project page?

Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Where do I sign up for wicketstuff-user and wicketstuff-dev?

Is this mentioned on the wicketstuff wiki?

-regards Nino

Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The way most (if not all) Wicket committers keep track of this list
(and all
other mailing lists for that matter) is to use gmail as their list
reading
platform. The threaded view of gmail is unsurpassed IMO.
I have 0 unread Wicket messages on all lists I'm subscribed to: user,
dev,
commits, private, wicketstuff-user, wicketstuff-dev

Martijn

On 1/29/08, Curtis Cooley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Martijn Dashorst wrote:

On 1/29/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  Remember, these mailing


lists are used by thousands of people all over the world and they're
here for a specific reason, to learn about Wicket (or to help others).


Remember that we are all humans, and that the social interactions

between

people is what makes a community thrive, as long as it is respectful
and
open. The occasional personal wish, note or other social interaction

that

happens on the list makes us remember that we are human, and a

community.

I think in this case the sharing was not off limits, and I hate to see

our

list go down a route where we take out any and all personal
interactions

and

have to limit ourselves to the java problem du jour.

What we do need to be careful of is that it transcends into mostly

personal

chitchat. However I don't see that happening anytime soon. The
number of
w00t ftw and other messages is pretty low, as are the number of
personal
life sharing.


Yes these messages are better suited to personal blogs or private

messages,

however I am not willing to start a police hunt or moderation effort to
remove any and all personal sharing on these lists.



This is a delicate problem. I rarely ever contribute since I'm still
learning and I really appreciate the complete answers I get when I ask
questions; however it is very difficult for me to follow this list.
Perhaps to some it doesn't seem high volume, but it easily triples all
the other mail I get. To me anything that perhaps improves the signal to
noise ratio helps.

That said, I wouldn't want it turned into what advanced-servlets turned
into. That list was basically dead quiet and whenever someone did ask a
question there was a 90% chance the responses would be two page
diatribes on how that question was not an advanced-servlet question.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
Nino Martinez Wael
Java Specialist @ Jayway DK
http://www.jayway.dk
+45 2936 7684


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to