Am I the only one who gets confused with all those <>?
you are not!
Can't we just
drop the component generification? I see a lot of problems and type
duplication for little gain. I think having IModel generified is a
good thing because it allows you to specify types on your component
constructors.
I fully agree. When even Pages get generified, I think the reuse of
markup will be severely compromised, for instance. Because either all
page models need to extend from the base page's Model, or you need to
explicate that you consider your page modelless by using the Void type (?)
Please, please reconsider the design decisions and make explicit:
- what is the purpose of Model generification?
- what is the purpose of Component generification?
- what is the impact of Component generification?
I sometimes get the feeling that there is no 'grand view' on
generification, but that the operation just took off and now all kinds
of generic propagations are implemented in an ad hoc fashion...
regards,
Wouter
--
Wouter Huijnink
Func. Internet Integration
W http://www.func.nl
T +31 20 4230000
F +31 20 4223500
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
