Perhaps, but at least there would be an end to their complaining at some point. You won't get that with the current approach.
Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > > > On May 22, 2008, at 0:24 , Jonathan Locke wrote: > >> >> For myself (and I think a lot of the Java community), I would have >> preferred >> an awesome version of generics that was easier to use, less >> efficient and >> broke backwards compatibility. At a deeper level, I think there was >> a key > > ... and in this way the other million of people would have complained. > >> >> early mistake in not planning for and providing mechanisms for >> breaking >> backwards compatibility in Java in order to improve the platform. The >> generics fiasco is just one manifestation of this larger problem. >> > > > -- > Fabrizio Giudici, Ph.D. - Java Architect, Project Manager > Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." > weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/blog > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - mobile: +39 348.150.6941 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%28Class%3C--extends-Page%3C-%3E%3E%29--casting-troubles-tp17355847p17384913.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
