On May 22, 2008, at 0:24 , Jonathan Locke wrote:
For myself (and I think a lot of the Java community), I would have
preferred
an awesome version of generics that was easier to use, less
efficient and
broke backwards compatibility. At a deeper level, I think there was
a key
... and in this way the other million of people would have complained.
early mistake in not planning for and providing mechanisms for
breaking
backwards compatibility in Java in order to improve the platform. The
generics fiasco is just one manifestation of this larger problem.
--
Fabrizio Giudici, Ph.D. - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/blog
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - mobile: +39 348.150.6941
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
