On Wed, 21 May 2008, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > Before we do a vote I want to make sure what our alternatives are. > > I still like Joni's alternative. I don't think they are an > abomination, because the /potential/ class cast exception you get is > the same as with current 1.3. But the benefit of documenting the model > parameters in DDC, LV, etc. is HUGE.
I like that too and find it the best compromise, having the best cost-benefit ratio. Also, it's a localised starting point for Wicket with generics; later on we can see if more things should be generified. > I really appreciate the time and effort that went into implementing > the generification. But I also see what kind of mess this brought and > I really don't like the Component generification part. Yep, the hands-on experience gained by doing Component generification this far is very valuable. Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations Oy <URL: http://www.ri.fi/ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
