this has nothing to do with being open-minded.

i'm pretty sure that most non-trivial projects out there using jpa
with hibernate implementation can go through a big pain if they ever
decide to "change jpa vendor".
 now that you talk about jpa, this is an example of how backward a
spec can be: jpa 2.0 draft is only now addressing criteria, when we
should be including statically-typed queries and so on (ala linq /
quaere / jaqu).

granted the process might bring some benefit to wicket, but there are
way too many disadvantages, imo. and i don't really see how wicket
could become a sort of standard that gets different implementations.

anyway, i think we've got waaay out of topic =)

francisco

--
http://wickethub.org



On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Hoover, William <[email protected]> wrote:
> I hear the arguments and I completely agree with the notion that innovation 
> usually happens "elsewhere" and a JSR/JCP would slow that process down. I 
> just want to objectively view the other side of the spectrum :o)
>
> From a developers point-of-view standardization can often be a thorn in our 
> side, but for management it can offer a 
> vendor-independent/implementation-independent solution. Maintaining/upgrading 
> infrastructure is difficult, expensive and time consuming. From the 
> point-of-view of management a standard can often minimize the risk of vender 
> lock-in.
>
> Another thing to consider is that a broader multi-community involvement could 
> also bread innovation. There may be other innovators from other communities 
> that may have valuable input that could improve Wicket in ways that may have 
> not been previously considered. IMHO, the biggest argument for JSR/JCP is 
> that there is often a broader involvement in the process. Hibernate, for 
> instance, was in a similar position a few years back when they introduced a 
> new persistence concept. They have since become heavily involved in the JPA 
> specification process. When I first worked with Hibernate, like many, I was 
> very impressed (similar to the first time I worked with Wicket :o), but 
> looking back at how Hiberante initially did things to how they do them now 
> there are some huge improvements due to the JPA specification.
>
> My hope is that the Wicket community can be as open-minded to this notion as 
> they are to the open source code they represent :o)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johan Compagner [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 4:10 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
>
> and what would a wicket "standard" give you?
> Except that those idiotic managers then say "its standardized.. now you can 
> use it" why is that is a standard for ever? dont think so everything dies.
> But would it run on more platforms?
> Would we have multiply implementations? Because thats most of the time a 
> JCP/JSR does, it doesnt have an implementation, what wicket is, but a 
> description/interfaces what an implementation should do..
>
> johan
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:00, Martijn Dashorst
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Bill Joy from Sun once said: innovation happens elsewhere. I think
>> that the where elsewhere isn't, it is the JCP. Standardization is just
>> antithetical to innovation. Once something is fixed in brick/mortar
>> how can you innovate? Wicket is very comfortably located elsewhere.
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg
>> <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > we like the agility that the independence from any sort of a
>> > standard
>> offers us.
>> >
>> > -igor
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Hoover, William
>> > <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> Judging by the responses (or the lack thereof), It seems as though
>> >> there
>> isn't enough support from the Wicket community to push for something
>> like this :(
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> >> Behalf Of
>> Thomas Mäder
>> >> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:57 PM
>> >> To: [email protected]
>> >> Subject: Re: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
>> >>
>> >> I totally agree that the JSR process is horrid. However, Wicket
>> >> could
>> really use some more corporate credibility (which a JSR would provide).
>> >> The problem, I guess is that there are simply no corporate
>> >> interests
>> behind Wicket that would push the agenda. What wicket need is some
>> evangelism, but I guess all the core people have real jobs. What we
>> need is less talks titled "why wicket is cool" and more "cut your
>> development costs in two with Wicket". From experience, I am totally
>> convinced that you can save 50% off your development costs if you
>> switch to wicket (from just about any other framework), however, I've
>> yet to find a contracting job here in Zürich where wicket is asked for (it's 
>> JSF, or even Struts).
>> >>
>> >> Thomas
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Johan Compagner
>> >> <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> And then come into the horrible voting/administive stuff? Long
>> >>> Release cycles that are controlled, features that are discussed over and 
>> >>> over.
>> >>>
>> >>> Hmm
>> >>>
>> >>> On 12/02/2009, Hoover, William <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> > Just out of curiosity... Are there any plans to push a JSR that
>> >>> > Wicket could follow. I think there would be a lot more
>> >>> > acceptance of Wicket if this was to happen :o)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > -----Original Message-----
>> >>> > From: [email protected]
>> >>> > [mailto:[email protected]]
>> >>> > On Behalf Of Martijn Dashorst
>> >>> > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 5:33 PM
>> >>> > To: [email protected]
>> >>> > Subject: Wicket at ApacheCon EU'09 in Amsterdam
>> >>> >
>> >>> > We're happy to announce a lot of Wicket involvement at the
>> >>> > upcoming ApacheCon in Amsterdam (23-27 March 2009)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > First of all we have 2 training sessions available:
>> >>> >  - Introduction to Wicket by Martijn Dashorst on Mon 23 March
>> >>> > (http://tinyurl.com/aceu09wicket1)
>> >>> >  - Behavior-Driving Your Apache Wicket Application by Timo
>> >>> > Rantalaiho on Tue 24 March (http://tinyurl.com/aceu09wicket2)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Both courses are hosted by core members. Martijn has co-authored
>> >>> > Wicket in Action and Timo has been involved with WicketTester
>> >>> > and JDave. There is no better team to get you and your team up
>> >>> > to speed with the finest Java web framework available and start
>> >>> > cranking out fully tested applications.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Martijn will also present Wicket in Action during the normal
>> >>> > conference days. A quick introduction to Wicket's core features
>> >>> > in
>> just one hour.
>> >>> > But attending the conference will give you much more:
>> >>> > over 60 sessions covering your favorite Apache projects.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Amsterdam is great, but Wicket meetups in Amsterdam are even better!
>> >>> > We're attempting to schedule a Wicket meetup during the
>> >>> > conference at the conference floor. Details will follow soon.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Read more about ApacheCon EU 2009 here:
>> >>> > http://www.eu.apachecon.com/c/aceu2009/
>> >>> >
>> >>> > See you in Amsterdam!
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Martijn
>> >>> >
>> >>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> > ----
>> >>> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> > ----
>> >>> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Thomas Mäder
>> >> Wicket & Eclipse Consulting
>> >> www.devotek-it.ch
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>> Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released Get it now:
>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to