+1 YUI. I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to integrate to wicket. i used YUI components, like rich text editor or modal windows. I don't know the ajax how it is, because i use wicket ajax. NM
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Martijn Dashorst < [email protected]> wrote: > iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5. > Something with too many irons in the fire... > > Martijn > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I also agree that we should use jQuery. jQuery seems more aligned with > > Wicket than YUI. > > > > -- > > Jeremy Thomerson > > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> +1 Jquery I mean > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus < > >> [email protected] > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi > >> >> i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard > now > >> , > >> >> used by all the big companies , even microsoft > >> >> and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and > we > >> >> cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for > many > >> of > >> >> their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years > >> >> > >> >> this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or > >> just > >> >> pick YUI > >> >> thanks > >> >> Joe > >> >> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson < > >> >> [email protected] > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be > >> >> used. > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Jeremy Thomerson > >> >> > http://www.wickettraining.com > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < > >> >> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > Isn't this an experimental branch? > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Ernesto > >> >> > > > >> >> > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky < > [email protected]> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > > I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn: > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/ > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > 2010/4/26 Istvan Soos <[email protected]> > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> Hi, > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration > >> library > >> >> to > >> >> > > >> use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested > >> >> > > >> specifically in YUI 3... > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> Thanks, > >> >> > > >> Istvan > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> >> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Fernando Wermus. > >> > > >> > www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Fernando Wermus. > >> > >> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus > >> > > > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.7 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
