I thought wicket's goal was to be agnostic to this debate. D/
On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:09 AM, nicolas melendez wrote: > +1 YUI. > I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non > intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to integrate > to wicket. > i used YUI components, like rich text editor or modal windows. I don't know > the ajax how it is, because i use wicket ajax. > NM > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Martijn Dashorst < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5. >> Something with too many irons in the fire... >> >> Martijn >> >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I also agree that we should use jQuery. jQuery seems more aligned with >>> Wicket than YUI. >>> >>> -- >>> Jeremy Thomerson >>> http://www.wickettraining.com >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> +1 Jquery I mean >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus < >>>> [email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard >> now >>>> , >>>>>> used by all the big companies , even microsoft >>>>>> and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and >> we >>>>>> cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for >> many >>>> of >>>>>> their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years >>>>>> >>>>>> this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or >>>> just >>>>>> pick YUI >>>>>> thanks >>>>>> Joe >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson < >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be >>>>>> used. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson >>>>>>> http://www.wickettraining.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Isn't this an experimental branch? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ernesto >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky < >> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2010/4/26 Istvan Soos <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration >>>> library >>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested >>>>>>>>>> specifically in YUI 3... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Istvan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Fernando Wermus. >>>>> >>>>> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Fernando Wermus. >>>> >>>> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications >> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.7 >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
