there is also no reason to bundle all the components that need that kind of js as part of core, they can be stand alone modules.
-igor On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: > Yes, but Wicket has a lot of JS functionality built in (for AJAX, DOM > manipulation related to AJAX, modal window, autocomplete, etc...). Right > now all the AJAX stuff is done in home-grown JS. There's no reason for us > to continue to support something that does things like DOM manipulation. We > should use one of the many frameworks out there that do this already. > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Douglas Ferguson <doug...@douglasferguson.us >> wrote: > >> I thought wicket's goal was to be agnostic to this debate. >> >> D/ >> >> On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:09 AM, nicolas melendez wrote: >> >> > +1 YUI. >> > I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non >> > intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to >> integrate >> > to wicket. >> > i used YUI components, like rich text editor or modal windows. I don't >> know >> > the ajax how it is, because i use wicket ajax. >> > NM >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Martijn Dashorst < >> > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5. >> >> Something with too many irons in the fire... >> >> >> >> Martijn >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson >> >> <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: >> >>> I also agree that we should use jQuery. jQuery seems more aligned with >> >>> Wicket than YUI. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Jeremy Thomerson >> >>> http://www.wickettraining.com >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus >> >>> <fernando.wer...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> +1 Jquery I mean >> >>>> >> >>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus < >> >>>> fernando.wer...@gmail.com >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> +1 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy <joewic...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Hi >> >>>>>> i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard >> >> now >> >>>> , >> >>>>>> used by all the big companies , even microsoft >> >>>>>> and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and >> >> we >> >>>>>> cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for >> >> many >> >>>> of >> >>>>>> their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or >> >>>> just >> >>>>>> pick YUI >> >>>>>> thanks >> >>>>>> Joe >> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson < >> >>>>>> jer...@wickettraining.com >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be >> >>>>>> used. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson >> >>>>>>> http://www.wickettraining.com >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < >> >>>>>>> reier...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Isn't this an experimental branch? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Ernesto >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky < >> >> danisev...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/ >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> 2010/4/26 Istvan Soos <istvan.s...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration >> >>>> library >> >>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>>> use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested >> >>>>>>>>>> specifically in YUI 3... >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>>> Istvan >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Fernando Wermus. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Fernando Wermus. >> >>>> >> >>>> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >> >> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications >> >> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.7 >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
