Yes, but Wicket has a lot of JS functionality built in (for AJAX, DOM manipulation related to AJAX, modal window, autocomplete, etc...). Right now all the AJAX stuff is done in home-grown JS. There's no reason for us to continue to support something that does things like DOM manipulation. We should use one of the many frameworks out there that do this already.
-- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Douglas Ferguson <doug...@douglasferguson.us > wrote: > I thought wicket's goal was to be agnostic to this debate. > > D/ > > On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:09 AM, nicolas melendez wrote: > > > +1 YUI. > > I have been working with it, and it is a very good js framework, non > > intrusive with the markup, also was easy (i mean REALLY easy) to > integrate > > to wicket. > > i used YUI components, like rich text editor or modal windows. I don't > know > > the ajax how it is, because i use wicket ajax. > > NM > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Martijn Dashorst < > > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> iirc the new implementation of Wicket ajax is slated for post 1.5. > >> Something with too many irons in the fire... > >> > >> Martijn > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Jeremy Thomerson > >> <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: > >>> I also agree that we should use jQuery. jQuery seems more aligned with > >>> Wicket than YUI. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Jeremy Thomerson > >>> http://www.wickettraining.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Fernando Wermus > >>> <fernando.wer...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 Jquery I mean > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Wermus < > >>>> fernando.wer...@gmail.com > >>>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Fawzy <joewic...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi > >>>>>> i hope the dev team to consider jQuery , it seams it is the standard > >> now > >>>> , > >>>>>> used by all the big companies , even microsoft > >>>>>> and although YUI is great, Yahoo has its own problem these days and > >> we > >>>>>> cannot consider the commited to the lib, they dropped support for > >> many > >>>> of > >>>>>> their products and abandond many projects in the last 2 years > >>>>>> > >>>>>> this is my opinion only, u may make a vote or poll or something , or > >>>> just > >>>>>> pick YUI > >>>>>> thanks > >>>>>> Joe > >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jeremy Thomerson < > >>>>>> jer...@wickettraining.com > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yes, it's experimental, and it is not 100% decided that YUI will be > >>>>>> used. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Jeremy Thomerson > >>>>>>> http://www.wickettraining.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < > >>>>>>> reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Isn't this an experimental branch? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Ernesto > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:34 PM, danisevsky < > >> danisev...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> I think wicket 1.5 will use YUI 3. You can look to svn: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/_wicket/ajax/ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> 2010/4/26 Istvan Soos <istvan.s...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Is there a cool best-practice or even better an integration > >>>> library > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>> use YUI 3? I know the standard generic way, I'm interested > >>>>>>>>>> specifically in YUI 3... > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>> Istvan > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Fernando Wermus. > >>>>> > >>>>> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Fernando Wermus. > >>>> > >>>> www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > >> Apache Wicket 1.4 increases type safety for web applications > >> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.4.7 > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
