On 02 Apr 2011, at 01:01, Maarten Billemont wrote:

> 
> On 02 Apr 2011, at 00:13, Bruno Borges wrote:
> 
>> [    ] Please, check this box if you agree with EULA
>> [ x ] Please, uncheck this box if you don't want to receive notifications
>> 
>> 
>> In this case, I would set the first checkbox as required, and leave the
>> later as optional.
>> 
>> Vote for (1) +1
> 
> Please don't pretend a checkbox is a Radio component.  This is irrelevant to 
> this discussion.

I totally missed that you have two different questions here, apologies.

Nevertheless, you're disregarding my earlier statements.  You're asking us to 
make "setRequired" do something that's completely different from what it's 
supposed to do.  If you require a certain value, that's what validators are 
for.  If you require a value to be given, you use setRequired.  Checkboxes 
ALWAYS give a value.  There is no "I choose not to choose" option with a 
checkbox.  That is what setRequired is for.  It forces you to make a *choice*.  
It does not force you to make a specific choice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to