Paul Sayegh wrote:
> 
> Gary Rathbun wrote:Is there any disadvantage to decreasing the size of the
> pilot air jet,
> > as opposed to increasing the size of the pilot fuel jet, especially for
> > a 1500 cc engine?  I want to do whatever will make it run best, even if
> > it's a bigger job.  It sounds like the PAJ replacement is pretty simple.
> >
> 
> They do not do "exactly" the same thing.  Remember that air and fuel do not
> flow the same.  Although changing either  may correct a specific area of
> performance, changing the wrong one may make matters worse somewhere else.
> Sorry to make it more confusing, but it takes time and patience to get it
> jetted right.


It's beginning to sound like I should order a few sizes of each type of
jet (PAJ2, PFJ, MFJ) and have them on hand while I'm tweaking.  Will do.

Question:  Are the numbers of the jets a direct correlation of the size?
i.e.,
Does a Mikuni 160 main jet have a .160" opening?  If so, why wouldn't a
DJ 160 be the same as a Mikuni 160?  I understand that they're not.

Gary Rathbun
.............................................
To unsubscribe go to http://www.sayegh.org/unsubscribe.htm
.............................................

Reply via email to