Then is this not a more fundamental problem with how PropertyCallbackInfo and
AccessorInfo are declared. Wouldn't adding internal versions of them be more
consistent with the way other types are declared?

https://codereview.chromium.org/16286016/

--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to