On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:30 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Then is this not a more fundamental problem with how PropertyCallbackInfo > and > AccessorInfo are declared. Wouldn't adding internal versions of them be > more > consistent with the way other types are declared? > > https://codereview.chromium.**org/16286016/<https://codereview.chromium.org/16286016/> >
This was my thought, too. Furthermore, I don't really like ExternalReference::ICUtilityType, this is an even stronger hint that we are doing something wrong IMHO. -- -- v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
