On 2013/06/06 09:30:57, danno wrote:
Then is this not a more fundamental problem with how PropertyCallbackInfo
and
AccessorInfo are declared. Wouldn't adding internal versions of them be
more
consistent with the way other types are declared?
They have no represention as a heap object, which makes them fundamentally
different. I assume that's why there's no internal version.
https://codereview.chromium.org/16286016/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
