I did a little looking and the Link 10 is different from the Link 1000 in that it does
not have inverter control built in?? The 1000 is
shown as having inverter control and the 2000 as having provisions for 2 battery
banks....The Link 10 is shown as a round faced
meter and the 1000 as a square panel like the remote....sorry if this adds to the
confusion....
Jim
03/11/2001 11:54:13 PM, "Christopher H. Dow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Jim Clark wrote:
>>
>> I took a look at the diagram (pdf) and if I understand the function of the "emeter"
>correctly as summing up the charge, discharge
to
>> the batteries, and providing a %of capacity available, then the box labeled emeter
>is in the wrong place.... If I read the diagram
>> correctly, all of the charge sources go directly to the battery and the emeter is
>only looking at the load side (150 amp buss)
>>
>> I think the emeter shunt needs to be in the lead to the battery so that all current
>that involves the battery ( charge or discharge)
>> goes through the shunt....
>>
>> If I misread something or you have this covered some other way... sorry....
>
>Hi Jim,
>
>Thanks. I think you're right. Also, I actually bought a Link 20, which
>is sort of two emeters. What you are saying makes perfect sense to me.
>I have a rough design, and as each component arrives in the mail, I
>refine it. In this case, I haven't received the battery meter yet.
>
>I don't know if I mentioned this, but the Emeter is now being sold at
>West Marine as a Link 10. I wonder if they are trying to rebrand it to
>avoid confusion with the emeter of scientology.
>
>C
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe or to change to a daily Digest, please go to
>http://www.airstream.net/vaclist/listoffice.html
>
>If replying back to this message, please delete all the unnecessary original
>text from your reply.
>
>
>
>
To unsubscribe or to change to a daily Digest, please go to
http://www.airstream.net/vaclist/listoffice.html
If replying back to this message, please delete all the unnecessary original
text from your reply.
