valhalla-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372745: [lworld] Fatal error in native method when running java/foreign/sharedclosejvmti/TestSharedCloseJvmti.java with --enable-preview Lois Foltan
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372745: [lworld] Fatal error in native method when running java/foreign/sharedclosejvmti/TestSharedCloseJvmti.java with --enable-preview Paul Hübner
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8372745: [lworld] Fatal error in native method when running java/foreign/sharedclosejvmti/TestSharedCloseJvmti.java with --enable-preview Paul Hübner
• git: openjdk/valhalla: lworld: 8373692: [lworld] compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestTrivialMethods.java fails with methods not getting C2 compiled Christian Hagedorn
• [lworld] RFR: 8373692: [lworld] compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestTrivialMethods.java fails with methods not getting C2 compiled Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373692: [lworld] compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestTrivialMethods.java fails with methods not getting C2 compiled Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373692: [lworld] compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestTrivialMethods.java fails with methods not getting C2 compiled Christian Hagedorn
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8373692: [lworld] compiler/valhalla/inlinetypes/TestTrivialMethods.java fails with methods not getting C2 compiled Christian Hagedorn
• git: openjdk/valhalla: lworld: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Paul Hübner
• Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373916: [lworld] TypeName.this.FieldName should be restricted in early construction context [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373916: [lworld] TypeName.this.FieldName should be restricted in early construction context [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8373916: [lworld] TypeName.this.FieldName should be restricted in early construction context [v2] Vicente Romero
• Integrated: [type-classes] 8335451: Prototype support for an exact integer arithmetic type Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8335451: Prototype support for an exact integer arithmetic type [v4] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8335451: Prototype support for an exact integer arithmetic type [v4] Joe Darcy
• [lworld] Integrated: 8376045: [lworld] Treat @NullRestricted fields as ACC_STRICT_INIT on load Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8335451: Prototype support for an exact integer arithmetic type [v3] Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8335451: Prototype support for an exact integer arithmetic type [v2] Joe Darcy
• [lworld] RFR: 8376532: [lworld] Size of BUFFERED layout is sometimes smaller than size of NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376532: [lworld] Size of BUFFERED layout is sometimes smaller than size of NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376532: [lworld] Size of BUFFERED layout is sometimes smaller than size of NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376532: [lworld] Size of BUFFERED layout is sometimes smaller than size of NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376532: [lworld] Size of BUFFERED layout is sometimes smaller than size of NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376532: [lworld] Size of BUFFERED layout is sometimes smaller than size of NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376532: [lworld] Size of BUFFERED layout is sometimes smaller than size of NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376532: [lworld] Size of BUFFERED layout is sometimes smaller than size of NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376532: [lworld] Size of BUFFERED layout is sometimes smaller than size of NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376532: [lworld] Size of BUFFERED layout is sometimes smaller than size of NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376532: [lworld] Size of BUFFERED layout is sometimes smaller than size of NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout [v3] Frederic Parain
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376532: [lworld] Size of BUFFERED layout is sometimes smaller than size of NULLABLE_NON_ATOMIC_FLAT layout Frederic Parain
• [lworld] RFR: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes Dan Heidinga
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes [v3] Paul Hübner
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8374025: [lworld] valhalla/valuetypes/SubstitutabilityTest.java fails due to argument clashes Paul Hübner
• [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v2] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v2] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v3] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] Joel Sikström
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] duke
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout [v4] Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376652: [lworld] Explicit and consistent names for nonstatic fields in FieldLayout Joel Sikström
• RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v4] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v5] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt [v5] Joe Darcy
  • Integrated: [type-classes] 8375482: Basic tests for UnsignedInt Joe Darcy
• RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v2] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v4] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v4] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v4] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v5] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v6] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v7] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v7] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation [v8] Vicente Romero
  • Integrated: javac should not place initializers of null restricted fields before the super invocation Vicente Romero
• [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Casper Norrbin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Casper Norrbin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla [v2] duke
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8374115: [lworld] test_classPrinter.cpp fails with Valhalla Casper Norrbin
• [lworld] Integrated: 8376171: [lworld] Enable storing the hash code in the mark word of value objects Tobias Hartmann
• Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375441: [lworld] C2: assert(is_instance()) failed: bad cast [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375441: [lworld] C2: assert(is_instance()) failed: bad cast [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375441: [lworld] C2: assert(is_instance()) failed: bad cast [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375441: [lworld] C2: assert(is_instance()) failed: bad cast [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375441: [lworld] C2: assert(is_instance()) failed: bad cast [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375441: [lworld] C2: assert(is_instance()) failed: bad cast [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375441: [lworld] C2: assert(is_instance()) failed: bad cast [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375441: [lworld] C2: assert(is_instance()) failed: bad cast [v2] Marc Chevalier
• [lworld] RFR: 8375777: [lworld] jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckLinks.java failed with missing ids Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375777: [lworld] jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckLinks.java failed with missing ids Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375777: [lworld] jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckLinks.java failed with missing ids [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375777: [lworld] jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckLinks.java failed with missing ids [v2] David Simms
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375777: [lworld] jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckLinks.java failed with missing ids [v2] Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8375777: [lworld] jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckLinks.java failed with missing ids Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8376512: [lworld] Value objects should consistently use System.identityHashCode Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376512: [lworld] Value objects should consistently use System.identityHashCode Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376512: [lworld] Value objects should consistently use System.identityHashCode Roger Riggs
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376512: [lworld] Value objects should consistently use System.identityHashCode Roger Riggs
• [lworld] RFR: 8376528: [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files David Beaumont
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376528: [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376528: [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files [v2] David Beaumont
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376528: [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files [v2] duke
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376528: [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files [v2] Roger Riggs
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376528: [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files David Beaumont
• [lworld] RFR: 8372599: [lworld] runtime/cds/serviceability/ReplaceCriticalClassesForSubgraphs.java fails with --enable-preview Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372599: [lworld] runtime/cds/serviceability/ReplaceCriticalClassesForSubgraphs.java fails with --enable-preview Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372599: [lworld] runtime/cds/serviceability/ReplaceCriticalClassesForSubgraphs.java fails with --enable-preview [v2] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372599: [lworld] runtime/cds/serviceability/ReplaceCriticalClassesForSubgraphs.java fails with --enable-preview [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8372599: [lworld] runtime/cds/serviceability/ReplaceCriticalClassesForSubgraphs.java fails with --enable-preview [v2] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8372599: [lworld] runtime/cds/serviceability/ReplaceCriticalClassesForSubgraphs.java fails with --enable-preview Matias Saavedra Silva
• Integrated: [type-classes] 8376040: Add prototype "textbook complex" class Joe Darcy
• Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376045: [lworld] Treat @NullRestricted fields as ACC_STRICT_INIT on load [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376045: [lworld] Treat @NullRestricted fields as ACC_STRICT_INIT on load [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376045: [lworld] Treat @NullRestricted fields as ACC_STRICT_INIT on load [v7] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376045: [lworld] Treat @NullRestricted fields as ACC_STRICT_INIT on load [v7] Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Roger Riggs
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview [v2] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374959: [lworld] runtime/cds/appcds/cacheObject/ArchivedIntegerCacheTest.java fails with --enable-preview Matias Saavedra Silva
• Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376045: [lworld] Treat @NullRestricted fields as ACC_STRICT_INIT on load [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376045: [lworld] Treat @NullRestricted fields as ACC_STRICT_INIT on load [v6] Frederic Parain
• [lworld] Integrated: 8376033: [lworld] Remove auto early construction from strict fields Chen Liang
• Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376171: [lworld] Enable storing the hash code in the mark word of value objects [v4] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376171: [lworld] Enable storing the hash code in the mark word of value objects [v4] Paul Hübner
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376171: [lworld] Enable storing the hash code in the mark word of value objects [v4] Tobias Hartmann
• [lworld] RFR: 8374786: [lworld] C2: Missing asserts in parse3.cpp after merging JDK-8341411 Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374786: [lworld] C2: Missing asserts in parse3.cpp after merging JDK-8341411 Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374786: [lworld] C2: Missing asserts in parse3.cpp after merging JDK-8341411 Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8374786: [lworld] C2: Missing asserts in parse3.cpp after merging JDK-8341411 Tobias Hartmann
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8374786: [lworld] C2: Missing asserts in parse3.cpp after merging JDK-8341411 Christian Hagedorn
• RFR: [Type-classes] Fix issue with type class op resolution inside speculative attribution Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] Fix issue with type class op resolution inside speculative attribution Danish Nawab
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] Fix issue with type class op resolution inside speculative attribution Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] Fix issue with type class op resolution inside speculative attribution [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] Fix issue with type class op resolution inside speculative attribution [v2] Danish Nawab
  • Integrated: [type-classes] Fix issue with type class op resolution inside speculative attribution Maurizio Cimadamore
• [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY Joe Darcy
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY [v3] Joe Darcy
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376430: [lworld] Remove Modifier.IDENTITY Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8375574: [lworld] tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with CURRENT_PREVIEW_FEATURES Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375574: [lworld] tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with CURRENT_PREVIEW_FEATURES Vicente Romero
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8375574: [lworld] tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with CURRENT_PREVIEW_FEATURES Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375574: [lworld] tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with CURRENT_PREVIEW_FEATURES Chen Liang
• [lworld] RFR: 8376427: [lworld] Mark Strict Fields APIs as part of Strict Fields JEP Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376427: [lworld] Mark Strict Fields APIs as part of Strict Fields JEP [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376427: [lworld] Mark Strict Fields APIs as part of Strict Fields JEP [v2] Vicente Romero
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376427: [lworld] Mark Strict Fields APIs as part of Strict Fields JEP [v2] Chen Liang
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376427: [lworld] Mark Strict Fields APIs as part of Strict Fields JEP Chen Liang
• RFR: 8376250: Upgrade Bfloat16 to use operators Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: [type-classes] 8376250: Upgrade Bfloat16 to use operators [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Integrated: [type-classes] 8376250: Upgrade Bfloat16 to use operators Joe Darcy
• [lworld] RFR: 8375074: [lworld] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ModificationWatchpointEvent/valueToBe/valuetobe001/TestDescription.java fails with --enable-preview Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375074: [lworld] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ModificationWatchpointEvent/valueToBe/valuetobe001/TestDescription.java fails with --enable-preview Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375074: [lworld] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ModificationWatchpointEvent/valueToBe/valuetobe001/TestDescription.java fails with --enable-preview Alex Menkov
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375074: [lworld] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ModificationWatchpointEvent/valueToBe/valuetobe001/TestDescription.java fails with --enable-preview Chris Plummer
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8375074: [lworld] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ModificationWatchpointEvent/valueToBe/valuetobe001/TestDescription.java fails with --enable-preview Serguei Spitsyn
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8375074: [lworld] vmTestbase/nsk/jdi/ModificationWatchpointEvent/valueToBe/valuetobe001/TestDescription.java fails with --enable-preview Alex Menkov
• [lworld] Integrated: 8376411: [lworld] [BACKOUT] JDK-8376088 [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8376411: [lworld] [BACKOUT] JDK-8376088 [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] Integrated: 8376411: [lworld] [BACKOUT] JDK-8376088 [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files Daniel D . Daugherty
  • [lworld] Integrated: 8376411: [lworld] [BACKOUT] JDK-8376088 [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files Daniel D . Daugherty
• [lworld] Integrated: 8376042: [lworld] Revert changes to --patch-module handling Matias Saavedra Silva
• [lworld] Integrated: 8373202: [lworld] ObjectReference.equals should follow == semantics for value objects Alex Menkov
• Integrated: Removing commented tests Vicente Romero
  • Integrated: Removing commented tests Vicente Romero
• git: openjdk/valhalla: lworld: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting Matias Saavedra Silva
• Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376042: [lworld] Revert changes to --patch-module handling [v3] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376042: [lworld] Revert changes to --patch-module handling [v3] Frederic Parain
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376042: [lworld] Revert changes to --patch-module handling [v3] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8376042: [lworld] Revert changes to --patch-module handling [v3] Matias Saavedra Silva
• [lworld] Integrated: 8376088: [lworld] value class creation in CompileJavaModules.gmk leaves unnecessary files David Beaumont
• [lworld] RFR: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting Chen Liang
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting [v2] Matias Saavedra Silva
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting Dan Heidinga
  • Re: [lworld] RFR: 8359147: [lworld] Print early_larval_frame in VerifyError reporting Matias Saavedra Silva

• Earlier messages
• Later messages