Iraq,. I totally agree..and it was not until 2003 that he attacked Iraq..as I said, I always thought otherwise..never supported Bush for what he did..used to think just like you..but on hindsight, now I feel that him attacking Afghanistan in 2001 (I think I'd mentioned 2001 in my previous mail) after the 9/11 attacks is somehow justified..when I think about it, nobody has dared to lay their fingers on the US after that..
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Archana Sharma < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So Bush attacking Iraq as a response to 9/11 was wise? while Osama Bin > Laden chills out in his caves and shaukiya taur pe sends terror videos to > the world? He said he will smoke out Laden just after 9/11 and they did just > that with Iraq when that country had no role to play in terrorism againt > USA. > Arch > > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:05 PM, indu iyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Subu, >> >> Couldn't agree more with everything that you've written.. >> >> I used to think differently earlier about what Bush did, but I've gotto >> say now that howmuchever of a nincompoop he might be, what he did at that >> point of time (2001) was the correct thing to do, he had to show the world >> that there is no way anybody could come into his country and get away with >> it..I absolutely don't expect the Indian political class to do anything even >> remotely similar to that..The whole commando operation seemed very badly >> done , both timing wise and execution wise, and the poor commandos had to >> pay..God save India! >> >> Indu >> >> >> >> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VaniV88-89" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/VaniV88-89?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
