It's not true nobody has dared to lay fingers on the US after that...they have been trying and that is their ultimate goal. Mumbai, Islamabad, Bali is all chindi for them. It's US they are after. The difference is after 9/11 US became extremely cautious, very intelligent, foresaw trends and activities, kept a track of what's happening, tightened its security to an annoying extent. In UK too they have been plotting. The guy from Bangalore, (whose cousin in Australia almost became a hero) they drove a burning car into Glasgow airport...but before that their plot was exposed and many such vehicles were found in London before they could explode. They immediately spotted the liquid bomb possibility and immediately thwarted any such attempt. Ours is different, we just talk, threaten, complain, whine...and then again the country starts running "bhagwan bharose" until we are hit again. What happened in Kargil...we are callin it victory. What is so victorious about pushing enemies from your house when they were never supposed to be inside your house. That too after losing so many young lives. Our intelligence is crap, that's the bottom line Arch
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:39 PM, indu iyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Iraq,. I totally agree..and it was not until 2003 that he attacked Iraq..as > I said, I always thought otherwise..never supported Bush for what he > did..used to think just like you..but on hindsight, now I feel that him > attacking Afghanistan in 2001 (I think I'd mentioned 2001 in my previous > mail) after the 9/11 attacks is somehow justified..when I think about it, > nobody has dared to lay their fingers on the US after that.. > > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Archana Sharma < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> So Bush attacking Iraq as a response to 9/11 was wise? while Osama Bin >> Laden chills out in his caves and shaukiya taur pe sends terror videos to >> the world? He said he will smoke out Laden just after 9/11 and they did just >> that with Iraq when that country had no role to play in terrorism againt >> USA. >> Arch >> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:05 PM, indu iyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Subu, >>> >>> Couldn't agree more with everything that you've written.. >>> >>> I used to think differently earlier about what Bush did, but I've gotto >>> say now that howmuchever of a nincompoop he might be, what he did at that >>> point of time (2001) was the correct thing to do, he had to show the world >>> that there is no way anybody could come into his country and get away with >>> it..I absolutely don't expect the Indian political class to do anything even >>> remotely similar to that..The whole commando operation seemed very badly >>> done , both timing wise and execution wise, and the poor commandos had to >>> pay..God save India! >>> >>> Indu >>> >>> >>> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VaniV88-89" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/VaniV88-89?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
