I believe one of the strengths of VCL is in its ability to manage
software license issues and use roles to manage who has access to
what. Is this something that should be included or should we save that
for a later and longer description further down the page.


On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Andy Kurth <> wrote:
> I have created a Confluence page which we can use to work out the
> board resolution:
> Once we are comfortable with the resolution, one of the PPMC members
> will propose it on the general incubator list.  The areas we need to
> work on are in bold.  We need to define the project description and
> scope.  I wrote this as "dynamically provisioning and brokering remote
> access to compute resources".  Thoughts?
> Please check the list of initial members to make sure I didn't leave
> anyone out.  This list includes both PPMC members and committers,
> correct?  If we are in agreement that the list will be the committers
> after graduation, should the status file be changed now?
> The PPMC members also need to appoint a chair for the project.  I
> would be willing to do this.  Anyone else interested?
> Also, 2 more issues regarding the status file:
> The stock bullets under "Project info" should be removed.
> The description is currently "VCL is a management framework for
> building, dispensing and managing virtual machine images across a set
> of bare metal machines or systems with an installed virtual machine
> hypervisor."  I don't think this is quite accurate.  How about "VCL is
> a modular cloud computing platform which dynamically provisions and
> brokers remote access to compute resources."?
> Thanks,
> Andy

Mark Gardner

Reply via email to