Then perhaps the core should expose the required features, so that
Klaus can keep it his default way but a plugin can extend without
having to patch the core. The end user can then choose from a range of
plugins for his/her provider(s) in the way they think is best.
On 3/7/08, VDR User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Theunis Potgieter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So if provider 1 broadcasts a 2.1 channel and provider 2 also
> > broadcasts a 2.1 channel and you as a vdr user can have more than 1
> > provider. What will the channel numbering scheme be for Provider 2?
> > Will this introduce a bouqet in vdr?
> That problem already exists even without sub-channels and has never
> been officially addressed (to my knowledge). The people I know
> dealing with this issue pad the channel numbers by adding a set
> number. For example, if provider A and provider B both use 0000-9999
> for their channel numbers, the user pads one of the providers by
> adding say 10000 to the channel numbers thus having one provider
> retain 0000-9999, and the other becoming 10000-19999.
> vdr mailing list
vdr mailing list