And that works to a point. I have been trying to pad using the sat number
for example 790000, 970000, 1130000, etc. But this makes the numbers a bit
long. The problem here is that some providers like to sprawl with there
numbers using 4 and sometimes even 5 digits. The 5 digit channel problem is
minor though as those seem to tend to be data channels with nothing on them.
----- Original Message -----
From: "VDR User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "VDR Mailing List" <email@example.com>
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [vdr] sub channel numbering system
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Theunis Potgieter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So if provider 1 broadcasts a 2.1 channel and provider 2 also
> > broadcasts a 2.1 channel and you as a vdr user can have more than 1
> > provider. What will the channel numbering scheme be for Provider 2?
> > Will this introduce a bouqet in vdr?
> That problem already exists even without sub-channels and has never
> been officially addressed (to my knowledge). The people I know
> dealing with this issue pad the channel numbers by adding a set
> number. For example, if provider A and provider B both use 0000-9999
> for their channel numbers, the user pads one of the providers by
> adding say 10000 to the channel numbers thus having one provider
> retain 0000-9999, and the other becoming 10000-19999.
> vdr mailing list
vdr mailing list