Jochen Heuer a écrit :
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 11:03:45AM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>>> Is there any movement to files >2GB for the recordings?
>> I will most likely change this when going to TS recording format.
>> In doing so, I'd like to get rid of splitting recordings into separate
>> files altogether. However, I think there might be people who still
>> want this feature - any comments?
> I definately want it! I use the hardlink cutter patch because otherwise 
> cutting
> is really slow because of the copy involved. Going to HD it might even get
> worse if one movie is e.g. 10gb large and to cut out the commercials 9gb have
> to be copied. With hardlink cutter I use 100MB file sizes and cutting is 
> almost
> instant because only the files with the cut are copied/cutted. All the other
> files remain untouched!

I was about to bring this very same reason to keep multiple files.
With the increase in recording sizes, it would even be a good thing to 
add this patch in the VDR core.

On the other hand, with the increase of storage availability, I'd be 
satisfied with just leaving the file(s) uncut, and add in the core the 
possibility to watch a recording continuously by skipping the cut marks 
(I think there is a patch or plugin for this).


vdr mailing list

Reply via email to