Hi guys, A bit late in my response, indeed work has to be done here as well. Aside from the more refined commit window, an embedded diff viewer, a GUI for setting subversion configuration and a remembering my window state not that much. But those are features that would save me a lot of time during a day. My workflow is now pretty much Versions oriented, hence my demanding attitude;-) Really, I love the product but now that I have reached the point were we need to decide which way we'll go at the office, we are again considering cornerstone. Though I'll surely will keep following Versions development I might just have a small affair with the competing product. In my opinion it's just too bad development isn't going any quicker. I would pick out my credit card right away for merge support, there is for about $3000 worth of software on my computer, yet I spend most my time in a text editor worth $70 and a SVN GUI. I might as well spend some more...
Just my two cents Kindest regards, Marijn On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Vincent Robbesom wrote: > > Hello Marijn/theDo, > > I didn't mean to come across as defensively as I did, sorry about > that. > > Having read your messages again I realize you care a lot about > Versions. > > Development of the next release is going in a steady pace and we are > looking forward to present it to you, > and to tell everyone here more about it as soon as possible. This > release is not a 2.0, so it will be free of charge. > > Kind regards, > Vincent > > > On Nov 2, 3:27 pm, Ryan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Vincent, >> >> I'm just curious what Cornerstone currently offers that Versions >> doesn't (This is actually the first I've heard of Cornerstone). I've >> been pretty happy with Versions so far, but like to stay on top of >> what is current. >> >> On Nov 2, 7:51 am, Vincent Robbesom <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hello Marijn >> >>> That's ok Marijn, work has to be done on your site too.. though >>> we're >>> sorry not to be able to live up to your time schedule. >>> Developers aint hanging around lazy doing bits and bites around >>> here, >>> it is really lots of work.. >> >>> The To Do list on the new release is rather huge but it is >>> definitely >>> moving in the right direction. >>> The new Versions will be far more stable, the rough edges will be >>> gone >>> and there is a modest but very functional feature list to >>> implemented. >>> The people that can wait (a little longer) won't be disappointed, >>> I'm >>> sure about that. >> >>> Maybe you can trial cornerstone.. >> >>> Friendly regards, >>> Vincent >> >>> On Nov 2, 11:39 am, Marijn Huizendveld >>> <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >> >>>> Hi Vincent, >> >>>> Unfortunately that isn't the response I was hoping for. Depending >>>> on >>>> my colleagues decision I will now most probably move to >>>> Cornerstome. >>>> This is really such a shame. One would expect at least a estimate >>>> timeframe could be agreed upon... >> >>>> Too bad, really, but my patience has run out. >> >>>> Kind regards, >> >>>> Marijn >> >>>> On Nov 2, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Vincent Robbesom wrote: >> >>>>> Hey guys! >> >>>>> At this moment there is being worked on the bug reports of >>>>> Versions. >>>>> The screens, the memory issues and a dozen other things to do... >>>>> However, Since this is not our only product, we don't have any >>>>> exact >>>>> timeframe yet. >>>>> However we do realize the urge for improvement. No way versions >>>>> get >>>>> snowed in but things cost time and effort… >> >>>>> Keep posting on the support site an please be patient. >> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> Vincent >> >>>>> On Nov 2, 5:49 am, TheDO <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> I wholeheartedly agree with you. I've personally recommended >>>>>> Versions >>>>>> a few times to my colleagues, and now I feel embarrassed >>>>>> because of >>>>>> the sluggish updates to Versions. I, along with several others, >>>>>> continue pushing the Sofa team to speed up development, but I >>>>>> personally fear that means version 2.0, which will require a new >>>>>> license. I've been waiting several months for some minor >>>>>> improvements >>>>>> to Versions. The latest version even introduced some new issues >>>>>> that >>>>>> interfere with my workflow (ie. the sheet that stays on the >>>>>> screen >>>>>> when switching apps). I completely empathize with the challenges >>>>>> involved in software development, but when I also observe some >>>>>> teams >>>>>> keeping a nice pace with updates to their products, so I know >>>>>> it can >>>>>> be done. Let's see Versions jump to the front of the pack and get >>>>>> into >>>>>> the headlines again. It has amazing potential for really >>>>>> raising the >>>>>> bar on the Mac. >> >>>>>> /TheDO/ >> >>>>>> On Oct 30, 9:34 am, Marijn Huizendveld >>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Hi guys, >> >>>>>>> I really hate to ask this question again but I feel I have to. >>>>>>> Is a >>>>>>> new significant release to be expected anytime soon? >> >>>>>>> The reason why I'm asking is I finally convinced some freelance >>>>>>> colleagues of mine to start using SVN. Now they need to buy a >>>>>>> client >>>>>>> and at the moment I can't really say I'd recommend Versions over >>>>>>> Conerstone... The current state makes me consider moving over to >>>>>>> cornerstone, I can pitch in with their group license anyway so >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> won't be that expensive. That's really a pity, I've been using >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> since the one of the first public betas. >>>>>>> I do feel bad about it because I really would like to support a >>>>>>> product from my hometown and I really admire the products of >>>>>>> Sofa >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> that simply can't be the winning argument. >> >>>>>>> Please make me reconsider. >> >>>>>>> Kindest regards, >> >>>>>>> Marijn Huizendveld > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
