Hi Marijn, What benefit did you get out of Cornerstone and not Versions? I tried switching myself, but the only thing I found that Cornerstone actually did better was the commit dialog. Everything else was more frustrating UI-wise with no added features.
There's still not a well-designed SVN GUI out there that does merging — the first Versions/Cornerstone-esque app that includes this has my business. -Ray On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Marijn Huizendveld < [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Vincent, > > It's not like I will no longer hang around here and keep on checking > Versions out, but for my job I think I'll move to Cornerstone. If that > next big update comes out I'll be the first to check it out, trust me. > > By the way, I never implied nor intended to say you guys are lazy and > just sitting around. I've only asked for a little more transparency in > the development process so I could make an evaluation based on more > than trust alone. > > Good luck, > > - Marijn > > On Nov 2, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Vincent Robbesom wrote: > > > > > Hello Marijn > > > > That's ok Marijn, work has to be done on your site too.. though we're > > sorry not to be able to live up to your time schedule. > > Developers aint hanging around lazy doing bits and bites around here, > > it is really lots of work.. > > > > The To Do list on the new release is rather huge but it is definitely > > moving in the right direction. > > The new Versions will be far more stable, the rough edges will be gone > > and there is a modest but very functional feature list to > > implemented. > > The people that can wait (a little longer) won't be disappointed, I'm > > sure about that. > > > > Maybe you can trial cornerstone.. > > > > Friendly regards, > > Vincent > > > > On Nov 2, 11:39 am, Marijn Huizendveld <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> Hi Vincent, > >> > >> Unfortunately that isn't the response I was hoping for. Depending on > >> my colleagues decision I will now most probably move to Cornerstome. > >> This is really such a shame. One would expect at least a estimate > >> timeframe could be agreed upon... > >> > >> Too bad, really, but my patience has run out. > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> Marijn > >> > >> On Nov 2, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Vincent Robbesom wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> Hey guys! > >> > >>> At this moment there is being worked on the bug reports of Versions. > >>> The screens, the memory issues and a dozen other things to do... > >>> However, Since this is not our only product, we don't have any exact > >>> timeframe yet. > >>> However we do realize the urge for improvement. No way versions get > >>> snowed in but things cost time and effort… > >> > >>> Keep posting on the support site an please be patient. > >> > >>> Kind regards, > >>> Vincent > >> > >>> On Nov 2, 5:49 am, TheDO <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> I wholeheartedly agree with you. I've personally recommended > >>>> Versions > >>>> a few times to my colleagues, and now I feel embarrassed because of > >>>> the sluggish updates to Versions. I, along with several others, > >>>> continue pushing the Sofa team to speed up development, but I > >>>> personally fear that means version 2.0, which will require a new > >>>> license. I've been waiting several months for some minor > >>>> improvements > >>>> to Versions. The latest version even introduced some new issues > >>>> that > >>>> interfere with my workflow (ie. the sheet that stays on the screen > >>>> when switching apps). I completely empathize with the challenges > >>>> involved in software development, but when I also observe some > >>>> teams > >>>> keeping a nice pace with updates to their products, so I know it > >>>> can > >>>> be done. Let's see Versions jump to the front of the pack and get > >>>> into > >>>> the headlines again. It has amazing potential for really raising > >>>> the > >>>> bar on the Mac. > >> > >>>> /TheDO/ > >> > >>>> On Oct 30, 9:34 am, Marijn Huizendveld > >>>> <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >> > >>>>> Hi guys, > >> > >>>>> I really hate to ask this question again but I feel I have to. > >>>>> Is a > >>>>> new significant release to be expected anytime soon? > >> > >>>>> The reason why I'm asking is I finally convinced some freelance > >>>>> colleagues of mine to start using SVN. Now they need to buy a > >>>>> client > >>>>> and at the moment I can't really say I'd recommend Versions over > >>>>> Conerstone... The current state makes me consider moving over to > >>>>> cornerstone, I can pitch in with their group license anyway so it > >>>>> won't be that expensive. That's really a pity, I've been using it > >>>>> since the one of the first public betas. > >>>>> I do feel bad about it because I really would like to support a > >>>>> product from my hometown and I really admire the products of Sofa > >>>>> but > >>>>> that simply can't be the winning argument. > >> > >>>>> Please make me reconsider. > >> > >>>>> Kindest regards, > >> > >>>>> Marijn Huizendveld > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
