Hi Vincent, It's not like I will no longer hang around here and keep on checking Versions out, but for my job I think I'll move to Cornerstone. If that next big update comes out I'll be the first to check it out, trust me.
By the way, I never implied nor intended to say you guys are lazy and just sitting around. I've only asked for a little more transparency in the development process so I could make an evaluation based on more than trust alone. Good luck, - Marijn On Nov 2, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Vincent Robbesom wrote: > > Hello Marijn > > That's ok Marijn, work has to be done on your site too.. though we're > sorry not to be able to live up to your time schedule. > Developers aint hanging around lazy doing bits and bites around here, > it is really lots of work.. > > The To Do list on the new release is rather huge but it is definitely > moving in the right direction. > The new Versions will be far more stable, the rough edges will be gone > and there is a modest but very functional feature list to > implemented. > The people that can wait (a little longer) won't be disappointed, I'm > sure about that. > > Maybe you can trial cornerstone.. > > Friendly regards, > Vincent > > On Nov 2, 11:39 am, Marijn Huizendveld <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi Vincent, >> >> Unfortunately that isn't the response I was hoping for. Depending on >> my colleagues decision I will now most probably move to Cornerstome. >> This is really such a shame. One would expect at least a estimate >> timeframe could be agreed upon... >> >> Too bad, really, but my patience has run out. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Marijn >> >> On Nov 2, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Vincent Robbesom wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hey guys! >> >>> At this moment there is being worked on the bug reports of Versions. >>> The screens, the memory issues and a dozen other things to do... >>> However, Since this is not our only product, we don't have any exact >>> timeframe yet. >>> However we do realize the urge for improvement. No way versions get >>> snowed in but things cost time and effort… >> >>> Keep posting on the support site an please be patient. >> >>> Kind regards, >>> Vincent >> >>> On Nov 2, 5:49 am, TheDO <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I wholeheartedly agree with you. I've personally recommended >>>> Versions >>>> a few times to my colleagues, and now I feel embarrassed because of >>>> the sluggish updates to Versions. I, along with several others, >>>> continue pushing the Sofa team to speed up development, but I >>>> personally fear that means version 2.0, which will require a new >>>> license. I've been waiting several months for some minor >>>> improvements >>>> to Versions. The latest version even introduced some new issues >>>> that >>>> interfere with my workflow (ie. the sheet that stays on the screen >>>> when switching apps). I completely empathize with the challenges >>>> involved in software development, but when I also observe some >>>> teams >>>> keeping a nice pace with updates to their products, so I know it >>>> can >>>> be done. Let's see Versions jump to the front of the pack and get >>>> into >>>> the headlines again. It has amazing potential for really raising >>>> the >>>> bar on the Mac. >> >>>> /TheDO/ >> >>>> On Oct 30, 9:34 am, Marijn Huizendveld >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> Hi guys, >> >>>>> I really hate to ask this question again but I feel I have to. >>>>> Is a >>>>> new significant release to be expected anytime soon? >> >>>>> The reason why I'm asking is I finally convinced some freelance >>>>> colleagues of mine to start using SVN. Now they need to buy a >>>>> client >>>>> and at the moment I can't really say I'd recommend Versions over >>>>> Conerstone... The current state makes me consider moving over to >>>>> cornerstone, I can pitch in with their group license anyway so it >>>>> won't be that expensive. That's really a pity, I've been using it >>>>> since the one of the first public betas. >>>>> I do feel bad about it because I really would like to support a >>>>> product from my hometown and I really admire the products of Sofa >>>>> but >>>>> that simply can't be the winning argument. >> >>>>> Please make me reconsider. >> >>>>> Kindest regards, >> >>>>> Marijn Huizendveld > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
