On Nov 3, 10:52 am, Jade <jadeo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all > > I'm the author ofhttp://jadeohlhauser.com/2008/c_vs_v/where I > explain why I prefer Cornerstone. Since then Cornerstone has recently > released a major update that addressed many of the shortcomings. In > other words, the better Mac SVN client got even better.
But it took a long time. Cornerstone has not been exactly cranking out updates either. I recently downloaded Cornerstone to compare against Versions. Cornerstone is a nice, polished product, but I think Versions has the better UI. Cornerstone is also larger on disk, takes more memory to run and is more expensive than Versions. Having said that, there are definitely some things I liked better in Cornerstone, but not enough to make me switch from Versions... Yet. It's disappointing that there does not seem to be a sense of urgency from Sofa with regard to some of the "show stopper" bugs that some Versions users are experiencing. It's fine to say that they are working hard on a whole bunch of updates and improvements, but I think most people would prefer that critical issues get fixed ASAP. As I've said in another post, and others have said here, I can no longer recommend Versions to colleagues and feel a little embarrassed for doing so to some others. Add to this the rising popularity of decentralized version control systems such as Git, Mercurial, and Bazaar... It makes me consider dropping SVN altogether. -- Kevin Powick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Versions" group. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to versions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---