Confused...
"For the list"... followed by an angry man-to-man message to Jimmy. Why do
you want the list to know that you're coming down on him... support?

/Nick

  -----Original Message-----
  From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]on
Behalf Of jim phillips
  Sent: 07 June 2009 05:37
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: FW: [VFB] Re: Artistic Fly Swap Clarification


  For Mark

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
  From: [email protected]
  To: [email protected]; [email protected]
  Subject: RE: [VFB] Re: Artistic Fly Swap Clarification
  Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 21:08:40 -0600

  for the list...........
  Jimmy, NEVER, EVER speak for me..........you have no idea what your doing.
And obviously you do not keep track of current emails. I have recently told
Don that i absolutely DO consider his work ART. Guess you missed that. You
obviously also missed where i have VERY recently clarified Jim Phillips
mistakes in my original clarification, (he had inserted some words of his
own, including that bit bout "using exotic materials, fancy beads, and silk
thread".....HIS words, NOT mine), so keep up to date if your gonna
challange, or cause controversey. Bottom line, ART is something you "Know"
when you see it. Just ask Stevie Wonder.  mark.....


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
  Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 21:10:32 -0500
  From: [email protected]
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: [VFB] Re: Artistic Fly Swap Clarification

  Who's to say what's art/artistic and what's not.  Even though Mark doesn't
feel that way, Dono's monster/Super sized flies are definitely ART in my
book.  I don't feel that using exotic materials, fancy beads and silk thread
make a fly a work of art. What is art ? what qualifies as art.   To muddy
the ART water somewhat, I offer the following that I gleaned from Google.
"The definition of art is controversial in contemporary philosophy. Whether
art can be defined has also been a matter of controversy. The philosophical
usefulness of a definition of art has also been debated.  Contemporary
definitions are of two main sorts. One distinctively modern,
conventionalist, sort of definition focuses on art's institutional features,
emphasizing the way art changes over time, modern works that appear to break
radically with all traditional art, and the relational properties of
artworks that depend on works' relations to art history, art genres, etc.
The less conventionalist sort of contemporary definition makes use of a
broader, more traditional concept of aesthetic properties that includes more
than art-relational ones, and focuses on art's pan-cultural and
trans-historical characteristics. From the Standard Encyclopedia of
Philosophy.

  “It is not at all clear that these words – ‘What is art?’ – express
anything like a single question, to which competing answers are given, or
whether philosophers proposing answers are even engaged in the same debate….
The sheer variety of proposed definitions should give us pause. One cannot
help wondering whether there is any sense in which they are attempts to …
clarify the same cultural practices, or address the same issue.”
  From the Standard Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

  In other words, what I classify as art, when compared to what you classify
as art can be totally different, while both can still be classified as ART !

  We had a thread about this some years back with several VFB members
joining the discussion.  Is fly tying an art or simply a craft. Below are
some of the comments.


  Re: [VFB] new super realistic fly
    2002/04/07 I would urge all fly tyers to take a look at what can be
achieved. Vlad has demonstrated that fly tying (as shown on his mosquito web
page) can transcend craft and achieve the status of fine art. Thank you Vlad
for sharing your art with us. Ed At 01:50 PM 4/6/02, you wrote: Hi -- Ed
Engelman/Sue Atkinson
  RE: [VFB] new super realistic fly
    2002/04/07 Dear Listers I want to say thanks for your kind words and
interest to this my fly. Super realistic flies have no the practical purpose
like almost all kinds of fine art, they only can give few minutes of
pleasure looking at them (or many week while tying them) and I very proud
that you like -- Vlad Markov


  Have A Good Day.

  JIMMY D

  Jim Phillips wrote:



----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: [email protected]
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: for the list.....
    Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 23:26:01 -0600

    Guys, just so we're clear..........the "NO recipes Fly Swap" is NOT
something that is about flies for fishing............i got one reply already
from someone who seems to think that flies, "that work for me" is what i'm
looking for.......usually that is what we swap...........but this time that
is NOT what i'm looking for. This swap is STRICKTLY for "Artistic" flies
that would be tyed for the wall as ART. Flies "should" be tyed on rather
large blind eye hooks using gut eyes. Materials are exotic feathers, fancy
beads and usually silk thread.  I know that many of my fellow tyers are able
to tie "mountable" fishing flys but these super flys are not what is called
Artistic (although they are beautiful).  Please check my website for hints
and also the web for artistic flys for some more ideas.  Remember - only six
tyers - first come first in.

    Thankx! mark






----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
  Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Get 25 GB of free online storage. Get it on your
BlackBerry or iPhone.
  


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VFB Mail" group.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/vfb-mail?hl=en

VFB Mail is sponsored by Line's End Inc at http://www.linesend.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to