Ah, micropayments, that favorite topic of mine!  Way back when, long
before blip, I tried to build a micropayments service with a few of the
folks now at blip.  The challenges we saw then are the same challenges
we see now: in order to do micropayments effectively you need a system
to pool transactions, and to do this you need a compelling collection of
content from a compelling collection of providers.  At the end of the
day building a real micropayments system is really about network
building.  No one's managed to do this well. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Watson
> Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 9:00 AM
> To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy and Magnify and 
> aggregators in general
> 
> I was just thinking of micro-payments. Any info out there on 
> the topic, or can we have a conversation.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ron Watson
> 
> Pawsitive Vybe
> 11659 Berrigan Ave
> Cedar Springs, MI 49319
> http://pawsitivevybe.com
> 
> Personal Contact:
> 616.802.8923
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> On the Web:
> http://pawsitivevybe.com
> http://k9disc.com
> http://k9disc.blip.tv
> 
> 
> On Jan 27, 2007, at 11:26 AM, johnleeke wrote:
> 
> > It is fascinating to read between the lines and learn business 
> > diplomacy from Mike.
> >
> > I agree with David, when it comes to the legality and 
> morality of the 
> > issue, "opt out" simply empowers the illegal and immoral actions of 
> > these secondary agrigators and distributors of our content. 
> They want 
> > and take our content because it has a higher value that 
> what they have 
> > to pay for it. The fact that their business model is based 
> on paying 
> > absolutely nothing for the content is the problem.
> >
> > "We cannot afford it" sounds pretty lame when they have 
> million dollar 
> > budgets. But even on lesser budgets what happened to the "micro 
> > payment" idea? Wern't computers supposed to make "micro payments"
> > practical? Why don't they set a policy of always paying, 
> then pay what 
> > they can negotiate with the content maker? Blip has done it 
> so we know 
> > it is possible. If they cannot arrive at an agreement with 
> the content 
> > makers, then they don't take the content.
> >
> > This seems pretty simple, and most of us learned it from 
> our Mommies 
> > by the time we were ten:
> >
> > "If it doesn't belong to you, then don't take it."
> >
> > Every particle of the conflict in this issue arises out of the fact 
> > that it appears they think they can ignore this basic tenant of our 
> > morality-based society.
> >
> > I think the fact that they do, or do not, "show their 
> faces" in this 
> > discussion tells us a lot about their character and intent.
> >
> > Mike and all, thanks for the good works and thoughtful discussions.
> >
> > John
> > www.HistoricHomeWorks.com
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to