My thoughts about a traditional license was that if I had to fight to prevent uses in situations I didn't want my videos to appear I would be on established legal ground.
>From a practical standpoint it would be easier to convince a judge my rights instead of educating him/her on CC licenses. I'm not going to switch anytime soon. I am considering it at this point because this is the second of many more instances of this kind of robbery. I also feel that the lawyers for Google Video, YouTube, Daily Motion and other services that are being ripped off may be planning their own response to this kind of theft. Cuz that what it is, they take Google Video RSS feed, set up shop and then have the nerve to slap ads from Google Adsense above it is just asking for trouble. Here is the deal. I want a tool or practical approach to deal with this kind of problem. I want something I can do that doesn't require the intervention of a third party. (But much appreciated.) I want something that I can use and can explain to another person if this happens here is what you can do about it. I think that what we are all peculating on. Gena > > Can you expand on that? What kind of license are you going to get > that would make any difference to someone aggregating RSS feeds? > > It's not "Creative Commons" that's being disrespected. They're > ignoring everything except the fact that you made a video and they can > subscribe to your feed. > > Do you think they actually _watch_ the videos they aggregate to see if > there's a licensing block at the end? Do you think, especially given > the response you received in this case, that they would bother to > remove each particular individual feed whose license they were > disregarding? CC or Traditional? > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "switching to a > traditional license". > > -- > Bill C. > http://ReelSolid.TV >
